From: John Larkin on

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100714/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill_20100616040848


If 100% of the oil is spewing out, why not close some valves and see
if less spews out? What's to lose?

John

From: Michael on
On Jul 14, 12:48 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100714/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill_201...
>
> If 100% of the oil is spewing out, why not close some valves and see
> if less spews out? What's to lose?
>
> John


http://www.despair.com/government.html
From: tm on

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:ao0s36praoiibqihlcc6rl8316eirkkhrq(a)4ax.com...
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100714/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill_20100616040848
>
>
> If 100% of the oil is spewing out, why not close some valves and see
> if less spews out? What's to lose?
>
> John
>

Obama has it under control. No worries.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: langwadt on
On 14 Jul., 21:48, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100714/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill_201...
>
> If 100% of the oil is spewing out, why not close some valves and see
> if less spews out? What's to lose?
>
> John

can only assume they are afraid plugging the "little" hole will burst
something
and create an even bigger and harder to plug hole.

an why plug it, why not get the oil to the surface and start
production, it
might as well start making money to pay for all the damage it's
already done

-Lasse
From: Sjouke Burry on
John Larkin wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100714/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill_20100616040848
>
>
> If 100% of the oil is spewing out, why not close some valves and see
> if less spews out? What's to lose?
>
> John
>
A blow-out? There is a big column of fluid moving at high speed,
block it suddenly and all sorts of interesting things are going
to happen.