Prev: boot times, not mdadm (was: Linux mdadm superblock question.)
Next: [PATCH 1/8] PCI PM: Add function for checking PME status of devices
From: Luca Barbieri on 18 Feb 2010 14:50
> We don't care about 486 SMP. �And yes, I think it is a better option.
> At least an assembly option, once implemented, will *stay* implemented
> and won't break due to some obscure gcc change.

After looking at it a bit more I fully agree: I'll resubmit with a
cli/popf assembly implementation and without the SSE code (which can
be done later if desired).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: boot times, not mdadm (was: Linux mdadm superblock question.)
Next: [PATCH 1/8] PCI PM: Add function for checking PME status of devices