Prev: Learning from my mistakes
Next: Punctuation that Basks
From: Val Hallah on 28 Jul 2010 02:26
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1298154/3D-home-movies-For-1-300-new-dimension-camcorders.html
From: David Ruether on 28 Jul 2010 12:03

"Val Hallah" <michaelnewport(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:abbd9055-3906-4b5d-934c-02f2ec7b5a8f(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...

[About a 3D camcorder attachment for standard camcorders.]
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1298154/3D-home-movies-For-1-300-new-dimension-camcorders.html

I made a 3D video once using two identical Mini-DV camcorders
mounted side-by-side, with the resulting images cropped and
edited split-screen for cross-eyed viewing. It worked reasonably
well, some of the time. ;-) This would be much easier to do
successfully with the 16x9 frame split horizontally, and with the
greater image sharpness and smoothness of HD - but I don't have
two matched HD camcorders to try it with...;-)
--DR


From: Val Hallah on 28 Jul 2010 14:17
On Jul 28, 6:03 pm, "David Ruether" <d_ruet...(a)thotmail.com> wrote:
> "Val Hallah" <michaelnewp...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:abbd9055-3906-4b5d-934c-02f2ec7b5a8f(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>
> [About a 3D camcorder attachment for standard camcorders.]
>
> >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1298154/3D-home-movies...
>
> I made a 3D video once using two identical Mini-DV camcorders
> mounted side-by-side, with the resulting images cropped and
> edited split-screen for cross-eyed viewing. It worked reasonably
> well, some of the time. ;-) This would be much easier to do
> successfully with the 16x9 frame split horizontally, and with the
> greater image sharpness and smoothness of HD - but I don't have
> two matched HD camcorders to try it with...;-)
> --DR

you could sue.....;-)
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Learning from my mistakes
Next: Punctuation that Basks