From: William Sommerwerck on
> To compare apples to apples, I called my supplier yesterday for
> current pricing: 63/37, $13.80/lb. 60/40, $13.30/lb. I also asked
> how many people were buying 60/40, and she confirmed that
> well over 90% of customers use 63/37.

Fascinating. It raises the question of why there is such a huge difference
in the pricing of Kester's solders.


> Now, you said that 63/37 eutectic nature was known 50 years ago.
> That may or may not be true, but what is true is that the widespread
> industrial changeover happened much more recently, about 20 years
> ago.

Hey, I read it in Popular Electronics in the '60s. It was probably known
back in the '30s.


From: Smitty Two on
In article <i1sqk0$6bn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
"William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgeezer(a)comcast.net> wrote:

> > To compare apples to apples, I called my supplier yesterday for
> > current pricing: 63/37, $13.80/lb. 60/40, $13.30/lb. I also asked
> > how many people were buying 60/40, and she confirmed that
> > well over 90% of customers use 63/37.
>
> Fascinating. It raises the question of why there is such a huge difference
> in the pricing of Kester's solders.
>

If you're referring to widely different prices from different suppliers,
it's the same with any product or service, of course. When the 99%
isopropyl topic come up, I plugged it into google's "shopping" tab.
Prices ranged from 2.79 to 14.50 for a pint of the stuff.
From: William Sommerwerck on
>>> To compare apples to apples, I called my supplier yesterday for
>>> current pricing: 63/37, $13.80/lb. 60/40, $13.30/lb. I also asked
>>> how many people were buying 60/40, and she confirmed that
>>> well over 90% of customers use 63/37.

>> Fascinating. It raises the question of why there is such a huge
>> difference in the pricing of Kester's solders.

> If you're referring to widely different prices from different suppliers,
> it's the same with any product or service, of course. When the 99%
> isopropyl topic come up, I plugged it into google's "shopping" tab.
> Prices ranged from 2.79 to 14.50 for a pint of the stuff.

That isn't what I meant. There's a 20% difference in the price between
Kester's 60/40 and 63/37 solders.


From: Smitty Two on
In article <i1sv01$oqv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
"William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgeezer(a)comcast.net> wrote:

> >>> To compare apples to apples, I called my supplier yesterday for
> >>> current pricing: 63/37, $13.80/lb. 60/40, $13.30/lb. I also asked
> >>> how many people were buying 60/40, and she confirmed that
> >>> well over 90% of customers use 63/37.
>
> >> Fascinating. It raises the question of why there is such a huge
> >> difference in the pricing of Kester's solders.
>
> > If you're referring to widely different prices from different suppliers,
> > it's the same with any product or service, of course. When the 99%
> > isopropyl topic come up, I plugged it into google's "shopping" tab.
> > Prices ranged from 2.79 to 14.50 for a pint of the stuff.
>
> That isn't what I meant. There's a 20% difference in the price between
> Kester's 60/40 and 63/37 solders.

Oh, so you didn't read my post after all. To reiterate, 63/37 is 13.80,
60/40 is 13.30. That's uh, let's see, oh yeah, less than 4%.
From: William Sommerwerck on
"Smitty Two" <prestwhich(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:prestwhich-D3E215.12482717072010(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> In article <i1sv01$oqv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
> "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgeezer(a)comcast.net> wrote:

>>>>> To compare apples to apples, I called my supplier yesterday for
>>>>> current pricing: 63/37, $13.80/lb. 60/40, $13.30/lb. I also asked
>>>>> how many people were buying 60/40, and she confirmed that
>>>>> well over 90% of customers use 63/37.

>>>> Fascinating. It raises the question of why there is such a huge
>>>> difference in the pricing of Kester's solders.

>>> If you're referring to widely different prices from different suppliers,
>>> it's the same with any product or service, of course. When the 99%
>>> isopropyl topic come up, I plugged it into google's "shopping" tab.
>>> Prices ranged from 2.79 to 14.50 for a pint of the stuff.

>> That isn't what I meant. There's a 20% difference in the price between
>> Kester's 60/40 and 63/37 solders.

> Oh, so you didn't read my post after all. To reiterate, 63/37 is 13.80,
> 60/40 is 13.30. That's uh, let's see, oh yeah, less than 4%.

<GASP!>

Yes, I DID read your post, and Yes, I did understand exactly what you said.
To wit... that there was almost no difference in the prices of the 60/40 and
63/37 solders from your supplier. That's why I raised the question about why
there WAS such a large difference between Kester's solders.

I think it was plain from what I wrote that I was wondering why there was
almost no difference in your supplier's prices for solders from (presumably)
the same manufacturer, while Kester solders had a 20% difference. (See
above.) Must /everything/ be explained in excruciating detail five times
over?

This happens over and over and over and over and over and over and over and
over, and not just to me. It's because people don't read carefully, then
think about what they've read. Believe me, I sometimes am about to respond
to a post, then discover I'm mis-understood it.