From: Dingo on
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:23:47 +1000, Sylvia Else
<sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote:


>You're trying to show that the police have acted improperly towards you.
>That you should omit very significant information relating to the sig
>line charge indicates that you're willing to be selective with the
>truth, and leave out stuff that tends to undermine the point you're
>trying to make. One will naturally be inclined to suspect that you've
>omitted pertinent information about the other incidents as well.

I fear you are talking to the proverbial brick wall - still worth a
try but Herc is in terminal denial, or a liar, or, oh wait, is
completely bonkers.....
From: Sylvia Else on
On 17/07/2010 12:32 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote
>> On 17/07/2010 12:14 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote
>>>> On 16/07/2010 9:01 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote
>>>>>> On 15/07/2010 9:59 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>> WWW.AUSTRALIANPOLICE.COM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bent over and strip searched a dozen times for no reason
>>>>>>> e.g. after visits through a glass window. I told my family not to
>>>>>>> visit
>>>>>>> Slept on concrete under a lamp 5 nights
>>>>>>> Gassed in my cell 3 times with obnoxious knock out fumes
>>>>>>> Using a toilet in an open room with 20 men
>>>>>>> Dragged to the floor, pinned down and stripped naked by 5 men then
>>>>>>> thrown into a cell, unprovoked 2 times
>>>>>>> "I've never gone to sleep to the sound of my pulse before"
>>>>>>> ~ Ashley regarding the prison PA terrorizing our unit overnight
>>>>>>> Charged with Queensland Stalking Law for causing apprehension by
>>>>>>> communicating on more than one occasion. 7 YEARS MAX
>>>>>>> Incarcerated 6 times without charge
>>>>>>> Sleeping in my camper van on the beach - 24 days
>>>>>>> Resting at my ex-girlfriends back yard - 14 days
>>>>>>> Telling my sister to shut up and walking away - 21 days
>>>>>>> Yelling at a neighbour to stop abusing me - 5 days
>>>>>>> Missing a bail appointment - 7 days
>>>>>>> Writing a love letter - 11 days
>>>>>>> Charged over the sigline 'please reply' - 5 months
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given that you've left out the trifling matter of threatening to
>>>>>> contaminate food in respect of the "please reply" charge, one has to
>>>>>> wonder what you've left out in relation to the various other
>>>>>> incarcerations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not really, are you suggesting police would lock people up for saying
>>>>> Please reply in a day or two, I'm about to put bluetack on all the
>>>>> KMart
>>>>> trolleys I can find?
>>>>>
>>>>> Herc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That doesn't even make sense.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> It's obvious I wasn't charged for a sigline with nothing more to it.
>>>
>>> But it's not obvious there was more to being locked up without charge
>>> over missing a bail appointment.
>>>
>>> So why would an implicit omission imply general omissions?
>>
>> You're trying to show that the police have acted improperly towards
>> you. That you should omit very significant information relating to the
>> sig line charge indicates that you're willing to be selective with the
>> truth, and leave out stuff that tends to undermine the point you're
>> trying to make. One will naturally be inclined to suspect that you've
>> omitted pertinent information about the other incidents as well.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Are you saying an implicit omission is being selective with the truth?
>
> You said yourself "Please reply in a day or two" is potentially an
> extortion demand.
>
> How many newspaper subject lines make AMAZING general claims but you
> find in the detail of the text there was a rudimentary explanation?

A tad different from making one claim, and then having the text say
something completely different. You weren't charged over a sigline. You
were charged over an extortion threat, of which the sig line was at most
a small part.

Sylvia.



From: |-|ercules on
"|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> wrote

> This is trivially true.
>>>>>>>>> Charged over the sigline 'please reply' - 5 months


'please reply...'

the ... is implied.

Herc