A new suggestion, about the new big linear accelerator that is now being designed!!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: New data suggest a lighter Higgs
Next: looking
From: Y.Porat on 27 Jul 2010 06:41 On Jul 27, 8:18 am, "Cwatters" <colin.wattersNOS...(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote: > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:b15c7613-9b51-47f7-b79f-50ed45ec045a(a)m18g2000vbg.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > I have some new suggestions about > > how to make that linear accelerator > > (among the other missions ) -- > > a base for a much more efficient Fusion reactor!! > > > yet it needs a spacial adaptation for that mission > > and it has to be done right at the beginning of that > > design . > > (while that additional adaptation can better serve - even the other > > missions as well !!!) > > > if they will address me - > > i will deliver it to them > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ------------------------- > > Write a paper. Publish it. ----------------- i ddi it here i will not do it publicly 2 it needs some sketches drawings etc verbal descriptions and explanations in shoty - work so if those guys are not open minded enough i a mnot going to 'break my head' for them 3 do you have some ideal (in case i bother to do it ) were could i publish such paper 4 let me bring here just one of the detailes i have in mind: at the opening side and end side of that accelerator to install some mirror of particle iow to instal a device that will recoil back the arriving particles and by that will RECYCLE THEM back BOTH :back a TH E MATTER (MASS) b PLUS SOME BIG PART OF ITS ENERGY BACK AGAIN AND AGAIN !! if you like *abstractly * --something like -- --- the way the laser is created ****yet it is not all the 'trick' **** !!! at this stage i keep it for myself and designers of that project if they will be curious enough !!! only someone like me that invested so much in nuclear research can thing about it .... TIA Y.Porat -----------------
From: PD on 27 Jul 2010 11:36 On Jul 26, 9:45 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I have some new suggestions about > how to make that linear accelerator > (among the other missions ) -- > a base for a much more efficient Fusion reactor!! > > yet it needs a spacial adaptation for that mission > and it has to be done right at the beginning of that > design . > (while that additional adaptation can better serve - even the other > missions as well !!!) > > if they will address me - > i will deliver it to them > > TIA > Y.Porat > ------------------------- Designers of accelerators will not look here for your offer. And if they did, they would not solicit people they don't know for a private communication. If you are worried about losing credit for the idea, then you should either file a patent application or publish your work with a copyright notice. If you want some visibiity, then you have to muster the courage to expose your ideas publicly, and invest the resources to do so.
From: eric gisse on 27 Jul 2010 18:13 PD wrote: [...] Y. Porat has only been babbling here for a decade. That he hasn't learned any English during that period of time is completely incidental!
From: Y.Porat on 27 Jul 2010 22:15 On Jul 27, 5:36 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 26, 9:45 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I have some new suggestions about > > how to make that linear accelerator > > (among the other missions ) -- > > a base for a much more efficient Fusion reactor!! > > > yet it needs a spacial adaptation for that mission > > and it has to be done right at the beginning of that > > design . > > (while that additional adaptation can better serve - even the other > > missions as well !!!) > > > if they will address me - > > i will deliver it to them > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ------------------------- > > Designers of accelerators will not look here for your offer. > > And if they did, they would not solicit people they don't know for a > private communication. > > If you are worried about losing credit for the idea, then you should > either file a patent application or publish your work with a copyright > notice. > > If you want some visibiity, then you have to muster the courage to > expose your ideas publicly, and invest the resources to do so. ------------------ onwe of the reasons i publish it here is TO TESTIT FIRST BY PEER REVIEW!! though i am quite sure i am right now i was not sure forunatance that installing soert of a a *particle mirror' at bothe ends of the accelerator was not already suggested or even done!!! so i wanter to test it and know is it is already in the original design !! so you see my aim was totest it STEP BY STEP but i expect that peer rewiw to be done by **CLEAVER** **HONEST** PEOPLE!!! not most of those crooks that i get here !! you talk about 'courage to expose....' i would like to ask you can i expect to expose things to ANONYMOUS CR0OKS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE COURAGE AND INTEGRITY TO REVEAL EVEN THEIT **REAL IDENTITY*???!!! so you can ask me why do you sometimes expose ideas and even make some discussion with those 'people' ?? can you guess why i do it in a limited (measurable ) way ?? (:-) 2 i asked you not to pop into my threads and even so you popped into it!! and i responded so you can ask why did i even so - answer you in a 'reasonable' 'civilized' way ? the answer is that i felt with my intuition and experience with people that your intervention now in this case was a apposite b unlike some other cases -- there was some sincerity in it !!! i still didnt see yet the responses of say inertial or Gisse or Higgins etc etc but i can guess **even before reading it ** WHAT WILL BE IN IT !!! so probably even if i will respond to them it wil not be no matter what i will say or suggest 3 btw PD can both of us - cooperate in making some publishing by your publishing company !??!! ATB Y.Porat ------------------------
From: Y.Porat on 27 Jul 2010 22:24
On Jul 28, 1:48 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Y.Porat wrote: > > I have some new suggestions about > > how to make that linear accelerator > > (among the other missions ) -- > > a base for a much more efficient Fusion reactor!! > > yet it needs a spacial adaptation for that mission > > and it has to be done right at the beginning of that > > design . > > (while that additional adaptation can better serve - even the other > > missions as well !!!) > > if they will address me - > > i will deliver it to them > > <giggle> > > A little knowledge goes a long way. You should look up: > A) What types of particles will be used in the linear accelerator? > B) What types of particles are needed to induce fusion? > > Then you could answer the crucial question: are they the same? > > Hint: if they are not the same, your "suggestion" is useless. > > Tom Roberts ------------------ that is why i am talking about some REDESIGN OF THE PROJEXCT BEFORE IT STARTS iow to keep some open eyes and ears to as many suggestions that can be no matter from whom they come with no prejudices !!! after all the budget there is AT LEST 13 billions of public money !!! and no need to** repeat** the "flop" of the current LHC Y.P ---------------------------------------- |