From: David Kaye on
PajaP <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

>I have not read his reasoning and neither do I want to. To me he is just
>a person, not an idol. I make up my own mind.

All I can say as someone who has been removing these things for the past 8
years is that I haven't found one tool that does it all. Currently, Avast
seems to be the best realtime blocker, but I'm betting that it wouldn't stop a
Trojan such as the one that is disguised in a list of images of Olympic
snowboarder Shawn White I came upon Wednesday night.

Here's the link to a Google image search.

http://images.google.com/images?q=%22shaun%20white%22

Beware the third image, the one with the URL of lenka-baby.sk. Going to that
website shows the photo for a moment and then displays a webpage that looks
like a malware scan. It then encourages the user to download a fix. Now, you
folks tell me: how many a-v programs are going to catch something like that?
Heck, Google didn't even catch it!

From: FromTheRafters on
"David Kaye" <sfdavidkaye2(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hllrsf$ihb$6(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> PajaP <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
>>I have not read his reasoning and neither do I want to. To me he is
>>just
>>a person, not an idol. I make up my own mind.
>
> All I can say as someone who has been removing these things for the
> past 8
> years is that I haven't found one tool that does it all. Currently,
> Avast
> seems to be the best realtime blocker, but I'm betting that it
> wouldn't stop a
> Trojan such as the one that is disguised in a list of images of
> Olympic
> snowboarder Shawn White I came upon Wednesday night.
>
> Here's the link to a Google image search.
>
> http://images.google.com/images?q=%22shaun%20white%22
>
> Beware the third image, the one with the URL of lenka-baby.sk. Going
> to that
> website shows the photo for a moment and then displays a webpage that
> looks
> like a malware scan. It then encourages the user to download a fix.
> Now, you
> folks tell me: how many a-v programs are going to catch something like
> that?
> Heck, Google didn't even catch it!

If the page doesn't contain malware, your AV won't (or shouldn't) detect
it. There is essentially no difference between a legit page trying to
convince you to download their legitimate program and a socially
engineered webpage trying to convince you to download their illegitimate
program. When you actually download the program (and it hits your
filesystem) it is then that your AV scans it. Then, there is little
difference between a legitimate application and an illegitimate one
programmatically speaking.

When antivirus programs were expected to detect viruses, they could at
least depend on the fact that *all* viruses have code that replicates
and very few legitimate programs do this. Now with being expected to
detect non-replicating malicious code, it is nearly impossible to tell
legitimate from illegitimate programatically. An illegitimate program
has to be reported as malware (determined subjectively) and detect it by
cryptographic hash algorithm comparison or some other means.

P.S. You were probably redirected from that site to another which
actually contained the social engineering. I recently read that nearly
80% of the top 100 legitimate websites have at one time or another
within the year 2009 led to malware of this type.


From: VanguardLH on
David Kaye wrote:

> PajaP <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
>>I have not read his reasoning and neither do I want to. To me he is just
>>a person, not an idol. I make up my own mind.
>
> All I can say as someone who has been removing these things for the past 8
> years is that I haven't found one tool that does it all. Currently, Avast
> seems to be the best realtime blocker, but I'm betting that it wouldn't stop a
> Trojan such as the one that is disguised in a list of images of Olympic
> snowboarder Shawn White I came upon Wednesday night.
>
> Here's the link to a Google image search.
>
> http://images.google.com/images?q=%22shaun%20white%22
>
> Beware the third image, the one with the URL of lenka-baby.sk. Going to that
> website shows the photo for a moment and then displays a webpage that looks
> like a malware scan. It then encourages the user to download a fix. Now, you
> folks tell me: how many a-v programs are going to catch something like that?
> Heck, Google didn't even catch it!

So what? That page is showing you some content that YOU interpret as an AV
scan. That it has some animation and some text and some graphics doesn't
make it malware or even a program. YOU will have to actually *download* the
software that they offer to then find out if it is malware.

I draw a picture of a gun shooting a bullet that blows a hole in a person's
head. So what real people have died to whom you showed that picture? If
that worked, you wouldn't have to wait to buy a handgun. Just draw to kill.