From: Nervous Nick on
On Apr 20, 1:03 pm, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/20/10 12:43 PM, in article
> WImdnfpeYZ1CelDWnZ2dnUVZ_jidn...(a)giganews.com, "Frank ess"
>
>
>
> <fr...(a)fshe2fs.com> wrote:
>
> > Tzortzakakis Dimitris wrote:
> >> ? "Bruce" <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> ?????? ??? ??????
> >>news:o9krs5p6muj0b1fk6c427j440utu6p5aie(a)4ax.com...
> >>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:38:14 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
> >>> <dha...(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote:
>
> >>>> Now, there's a payday ...
>
> >>>>http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+word....
> >>>> 503/story.html
>
> >>> So many words, yet no sign of the image that is being discussed.
> >>> :-(
> >> Probably, they will put it in a gallery where you'll have to pay an
> >> entrance fee to see it, or it will end in a private collection...
>
> >http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/lot_details.aspx?intObjectID=5315268
>
> A million bucks for a snapshot?!?
>
> I'm not 'buying' it...

Exactly my sentiment.

The image contains zero compelling attributes and quite a few annoying
ones.

It's not even a very good snapshot.

I had to check the date on that to make sure it wasn't 1 April.

Sheesh.

--
YOP...

From: Allen on
Dudley Hanks wrote:
> Now, there's a payday ...
>
> http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+words/2927503/story.html
>
>
After looking at some of his work online, I think that $1,000,000 must
be Zimbabwe dollars. I think $10 would be a more reasonable price--if a
light box is included.
Allen
From: Gary Edstrom on
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:27:27 -0500, Allen <allent(a)austin.rr.com> wrote:

>Dudley Hanks wrote:
>> Now, there's a payday ...
>>
>> http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+words/2927503/story.html
>>
>>
>After looking at some of his work online, I think that $1,000,000 must
>be Zimbabwe dollars. I think $10 would be a more reasonable price--if a
>light box is included.
>Allen

As with most other things in this price range, you are paying for the
name of the artist or the history of the item and not the item's
inherent value or what it depicts.

Gary
From: sobriquet on
On 20 apr, 20:16, "Richard" <smith...(a)btinternet.com.invalid> wrote:
> "Bruce" <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:o9krs5p6muj0b1fk6c427j440utu6p5aie(a)4ax.com...
>
> > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:38:14 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
> > <dha...(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote:
>
> >>Now, there's a payday ...
>
> >>http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+word....
>
> > So many words, yet no sign of the image that is being discussed.  :-(
>
> http://www.imageandnarrative.be/Images_de_l_invisible/Images/VG-Fig-2...
> :)

Those clueless clowns at Christie's are so funny. They didn't even
bother to shuffle the tiles, making it all too easy to stitch them up.

http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/1026/stitch.jpg
From: Savageduck on
On 2010-04-20 18:36:31 -0700, Gary Edstrom <GEdstrom(a)PacBell.Net> said:

> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:27:27 -0500, Allen <allent(a)austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Dudley Hanks wrote:
>>> Now, there's a payday ...
>>>
>>> http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+words/2927503/story.html


After
>>>
>> looking at some of his work online, I think that $1,000,000 must
>> be Zimbabwe dollars. I think $10 would be a more reasonable price--if a
>> light box is included.
>> Allen
>
> As with most other things in this price range, you are paying for the
> name of the artist or the history of the item and not the item's
> inherent value or what it depicts.
>
> Gary

....and he is who exactly?
There is no way Jeff Wall has a name worth paying for. The inherent
value of his work may be great for some, but I cannot find THAT value
in any of his work.

This is no Adams, Cappa, Larry Burrows, Stieglitz or even dare I say,
Herb Ritts.
--
Regards,

Savageduck