From: W. eWatson on
Thanks very much. In this case, there is definitely malicious intent, and
very deliberate intent. The perpetrator is known, and thinks they can
continue.
>
> The FBI will not get involved unless you prove a tangible loss exceeding
> $25,000 (to them, not sometime later in a court case, and which does not
> include any losses like your fear, stress, or other emotional weaknesses)
> and the civil or criminal is federal (i.e., somehow the action or effect is
> across state lines or involved federal property). They may provide info on
> how you can help yourself to persue the offender, especially if it is not a
> criminal but civil offense. While http://www.fbi.gov/hq.htm says they will
> investigate computer intrusions, they probably won't do anything unless the
> intrusion (which isn't criminal) is used to perpetrate a known crime against
> you. In many cases, they simply collect the information and do nothing for
> you personally. When they accrue enough information to identify the perp
> sufficiently that they feel they have a doable case to present in court then
> they act against the perp but will probably never contact you about them
> charging the perp. You end up helping them with your tips to catch a perp.
>
> Often you can call your State Attorney's Office for guidance. They tend to
> be very busy but if you call with a one-topic and focused question (which
> you obviously did not do here) then they usually will get you some helpful
> info on how to proceed.
>
> I suspect you are claiming the violative act is criminal when it is mostly
> like a civil offense. Call your police or call the State Attorney's Office
> for criminal offenses. For civil crimes to identify the perp, you'll
> probably want to find an investigator other than a lawyer so you don't
> accumulate those expensive fees for every action they can differentiate in a
> billing.
>
> http://www.ic3.gov/default.aspx

From: Peter Foldes on
Contact the person at the following link below. He is very capable on helping you
recover what was stolen and go after the crooks. Give him all the details. He is
very well known Internationally. Impeccable reputation. Tell him that (My)highly
recommended you

BoaterDave(a)hotmail.uk.co


"W. eWatson" <wolftracks(a)invalid.com> wrote in message
news:hka81l$gti$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> I've been look for Subject help for a friend. We only know of one such
> investigator, but he's not an attorney. He's very good at helping the police
> apprehend these crooks. He's in the San Francisco area. My friend lives near
> there. So any ideas on how to find such an attorney? Google has not been useful on
> this. Not even the police.

From: Tom Willett on
ROFL! Let the games begin.

"Peter Foldes" <okf22(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e0exQNPpKHA.4648(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
: Contact the person at the following link below. He is very capable on
helping you
: recover what was stolen and go after the crooks. Give him all the details.
He is
: very well known Internationally. Impeccable reputation. Tell him that
(My)highly
: recommended you
:
: BoaterDave(a)hotmail.uk.co
:
:
: "W. eWatson" <wolftracks(a)invalid.com> wrote in message
: news:hka81l$gti$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
: > I've been look for Subject help for a friend. We only know of one such
: > investigator, but he's not an attorney. He's very good at helping the
police
: > apprehend these crooks. He's in the San Francisco area. My friend lives
near
: > there. So any ideas on how to find such an attorney? Google has not been
useful on
: > this. Not even the police.
:


From: VanguardLH on
W. eWatson wrote:

> Thanks very much. In this case, there is definitely malicious intent, and
> very deliberate intent. The perpetrator is known, and thinks they can
> continue.

If the perp is known and you think you can actually prove who it is and what
unauthorized actions they have taken, get any lawyer you like to file a
civil suit against the perp where, for example, you charge $250 for every
incursion and $1000 for your cleanup costs to eradicate whatever malicious
effects you claim they committed.
From: VanguardLH on
Peter Foldes wrote:

> Contact the person at the following link below. He is very capable on helping you
> recover what was stolen and go after the crooks. Give him all the details. He is
> very well known Internationally. Impeccable reputation. Tell him that (My)highly
> recommended you
>
> BoaterDave(a)hotmail.uk.co

Are you implying that W. eWatson is yet another nym for BoaterDave and
you're, in effect, telling him to go screw himself? Or perhaps you know
that eWatson actually knows about BoaterDave's proclivities in Usenet? Or
are you just trying to punish BoaterDave by siccing eWatson on him?