From: David Ruether on

"Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
wrote in message news:2010060108592878840-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom...
> On 2010-06-01 07:43:18 -0700, "David Ruether" <d_ruether(a)thotmail.com> said:

>> All the new words [here] were "perfectly cromulent", as Lisa Simpson
>> would have pointed out...;-)
>> --DR

> You have just embiggened this whole debate. --
> Regards,
>
> Savageduck

8^), 8^), 8^) !!!
--DR


From: Robert Spanjaard on
On Sun, 30 May 2010 12:20:56 +0200, Robert Spanjaard wrote:

> A couple of flower macros for you to enjoy (and/or critisize).
>
> They might do well in the Wallpaper Shootin too, especially 4 and 5. But
> I already submitted a different shot.
>
> http://www.arumes.com/temp/macro/

I'd just like to say that I enjoyed all the messages in this thread.
So thank you for all your replies to, because of, and despite my
photographs.



--
Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: George Kerby on



On 6/1/10 8:48 AM, in article hu332n$f8l$1(a)news.eternal-september.org, "John
McWilliams" <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote:

> George Kerby wrote:
>>
>> What's plural of "y'all"?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
> vast spoiler space follows.....
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
>> .
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Here goes....
>>
>>
>>
>> "All y'all"
>>
>>
>>
>> Today's Lesson is concluded.
>>
>
> 'Ceptin' it's "All y'alls", ain't it?

Mite bee? sure bees!

From: rwalker on
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 06:48:07 -0700, John McWilliams
<jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote:

>'Ceptin' it's "All y'alls", ain't it?

That's the possessive, though there should be a catastrophe after the
second L.
From: Peter on
"Robert Coe" <bob(a)1776.COM> wrote in message
news:l7n806hjru02l2t4fhil8dmob8vs6fa8ko(a)4ax.com...
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 23:32:55 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
> <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca>


> :
> : "What's good for the goose, ..."
>
> I believe it's "What's SAUCE for the goose ...". ;^)

Does a goose get peopled?


--
Peter