Prev: Photo of Pionites
Next: Forget Dpreview's B.S., "diplomatic language" NEX 16mm lens is not good
From: Ray Fischer on 8 Jun 2010 01:42
Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>

>>http://dpreview.com/reviews/SonyNex5Nex3/page8.asp
>>
>>The kit lens however seems reasonably good, or about as good as one
>>can expect for an 18-55mm kit lens.
>>
>>http://dpreview.com/reviews/SonyNex5Nex3/page7.asp
>
>You obviously didn't read the comments about distortion.

Sony is an electronics company. Should anybody be surprised that
they're not good at optics?

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: Mark L on 8 Jun 2010 06:29
On 08 Jun 2010 05:42:35 GMT, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

>Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
>
>>>http://dpreview.com/reviews/SonyNex5Nex3/page8.asp
>>>
>>>The kit lens however seems reasonably good, or about as good as one
>>>can expect for an 18-55mm kit lens.
>>>
>>>http://dpreview.com/reviews/SonyNex5Nex3/page7.asp
>>
>>You obviously didn't read the comments about distortion.
>
>Sony is an electronics company. Should anybody be surprised that
>they're not good at optics?

By that reasoning, Canon and Nikon are optics companies. Should anyone be
surprised that they're not good at digital electronics?

Go crawl back into your Troll-Hole, FOOL.



From: Bruce on 8 Jun 2010 08:05
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:29:07 -0500, Mark L <markl071616(a)yaspamhoo.com>
wrote:
>On 08 Jun 2010 05:42:35 GMT, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
>>
>>>>http://dpreview.com/reviews/SonyNex5Nex3/page8.asp
>>>>
>>>>The kit lens however seems reasonably good, or about as good as one
>>>>can expect for an 18-55mm kit lens.
>>>>
>>>>http://dpreview.com/reviews/SonyNex5Nex3/page7.asp
>>>
>>>You obviously didn't read the comments about distortion.
>>
>>Sony is an electronics company. Should anybody be surprised that
>>they're not good at optics?
>
>By that reasoning, Canon and Nikon are optics companies. Should anyone be
>surprised that they're not good at digital electronics?
>
>Go crawl back into your Troll-Hole, FOOL.


Poor Ray, he talks such nonsense. ;-)

Whatever Ray may think about Sony, the company does make (or at least
puts its name on) some excellent optics. The 16mm and 18-55mm for the
NEX series just aren't among them, that's all.

From: Ray Fischer on 8 Jun 2010 14:06
Mark L <markl071616(a)yaspamhoo.com> wrote:
> rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>

>>>>http://dpreview.com/reviews/SonyNex5Nex3/page8.asp
>>>>
>>>>The kit lens however seems reasonably good, or about as good as one
>>>>can expect for an 18-55mm kit lens.
>>>>
>>>>http://dpreview.com/reviews/SonyNex5Nex3/page7.asp
>>>
>>>You obviously didn't read the comments about distortion.
>>
>>Sony is an electronics company. Should anybody be surprised that
>>they're not good at optics?
>
>By that reasoning, Canon and Nikon are optics companies. Should anyone be
>surprised that they're not good at digital electronics?

They've been doing electronics for how many decades?

And how long has Sony been trying to get into the more specialized
optics business?

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Photo of Pionites
Next: Forget Dpreview's B.S., "diplomatic language" NEX 16mm lens is not good