Prev: Relativistic Doppler shift
Next: Relativist running a race
From: BURT on 24 Jul 2010 22:43
Even matter is always three dimensional based on extension in 3
dimensional points of space. There is no nonlinear dynamics. You can
not model space fractally.

Mitch Raemsch
From: FredJeffries on 24 Jul 2010 23:51
On Jul 24, 7:43 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> You can not model space fractally.
>
Laurent Nottale disagrees
http://luth.obspm.fr/~luthier/nottale/ukrechel.htm
From: BURT on 24 Jul 2010 23:53
On Jul 24, 8:51 pm, FredJeffries <fredjeffr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 7:43 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:>  You can not model space fractally.
>
> Laurent Nottale disagreeshttp://luth.obspm.fr/~luthier/nottale/ukrechel.htm

Dimensions are whole and always are.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Jacko on 25 Jul 2010 08:43
On 25 July, 03:43, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Even matter is always three dimensional based on extension in 3
> dimensional points of space. There is no nonlinear dynamics. You can
> not model space fractally.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Yes, it can be proved only 2D and 3D orbits are stable, and so most
objects would 'accru' in 2 or 3 dimensions or close to. The space
itself could be any dimension.

It's an interesting idea to model physics by a (non-)linear
interpolation between clasical and schrodinger worlds. But essentially
it is chaos applied to dx and integrated for summation averages.

In that sense it it is a good 'fit', but it presents no order extra in
the undelaying uncertainty 'force'. It is a method of acknolwledging
wave propergation, not an understanding of how the chaos to dx comes
about.
From: BURT on 25 Jul 2010 16:51
On Jul 25, 5:43 am, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 July, 03:43, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Even matter is always three dimensional based on extension in 3
> > dimensional points of space. There is no nonlinear dynamics. You can
> > not model space fractally.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Yes, it can be proved only 2D and 3D orbits are stable, and so most
> objects would 'accru' in 2 or 3 dimensions or close to. The space
> itself could be any dimension.
>
> It's an interesting idea to model physics by a (non-)linear
> interpolation between clasical and schrodinger worlds. But essentially
> it is chaos applied to dx and integrated for summation averages.
>
> In that sense it it is a good 'fit', but it presents no order extra in
> the undelaying uncertainty 'force'. It is a method of acknolwledging
> wave propergation, not an understanding of how the chaos to dx comes
> about.

The space continuum of gravity is three dimensional and curved. This
is the round gravity continuum.

Mitch Raemsch
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Relativistic Doppler shift
Next: Relativist running a race