I was WRONG, LHC cannot produce black holes
in [Relativity]
|
From: guskz on 29 Jun 2010 01:44 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10430234.stm "It would be absolutely, fantastically exciting if we produced black holes at the LHC," he said. Yes, all ye gluttens, especially Aunt Al, that said there wasn't enough energy to produce ANY size black holes. -------------------------- Science already established that Black Holes can feed off of both Heat & Light (CMBR-Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation). And Science already established (in the 90s) that the force of charge is an exchange of virtual particles (photons). ------------ **I** AM telling you there's enough heat and virtual particles (photons) to feed that little baby mini-black hole till it instantly grows up to SWALLOW THE EARTH. 2010: BEFORE EINSTEIN, GUSKZ.
From: Raymond Yohros on 29 Jun 2010 13:50 On Jun 29, 12:44 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10430234.stm > > "It would be absolutely, fantastically exciting if we produced black > holes at the LHC," he said. > > Yes, all ye gluttens, especially Aunt Al, that said there wasn't > enough energy to produce ANY size black holes. > -------------------------- > > Science already established that Black Holes can feed off of both Heat > & Light (CMBR-Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation). > > And Science already established (in the 90s) that the force of charge > is an exchange of virtual particles (photons). > > ------------ > **I** AM telling you there's enough heat and virtual particles > (photons) to feed that little baby mini-black hole till it instantly > grows up to SWALLOW THE EARTH. > > 2010: BEFORE EINSTEIN, GUSKZ. more and more you prove that you are not intelligent and totally unworthy of learning or doing science. r.y
From: tue on 29 Jun 2010 15:58 On Jun 29, 7:44 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10430234.stm > > "It would be absolutely, fantastically exciting if we produced black > holes at the LHC," he said. > > Yes, all ye gluttens, especially Aunt Al, that said there wasn't > enough energy to produce ANY size black holes. > -------------------------- > > Science already established that Black Holes can feed off of both Heat > & Light (CMBR-Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation). > > And Science already established (in the 90s) that the force of charge > is an exchange of virtual particles (photons). > > ------------ > **I** AM telling you there's enough heat and virtual particles > (photons) to feed that little baby mini-black hole till it instantly > grows up to SWALLOW THE EARTH. > > 2010: BEFORE EINSTEIN, GUSKZ. a 10 cm cube of black hole cannot swallow a big earth stephan hawking is wrong, you are safe you need a much larger mouth of a black hole in order to swallow the entire earth good bye
From: tue on 29 Jun 2010 16:01 On Jun 29, 7:50 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > On Jun 29, 12:44 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10430234.stm > > > "It would be absolutely, fantastically exciting if we produced black > > holes at the LHC," he said. > > > Yes, all ye gluttens, especially Aunt Al, that said there wasn't > > enough energy to produce ANY size black holes. > > -------------------------- > > > Science already established that Black Holes can feed off of both Heat > > & Light (CMBR-Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation). > > > And Science already established (in the 90s) that the force of charge > > is an exchange of virtual particles (photons). > > > ------------ > > **I** AM telling you there's enough heat and virtual particles > > (photons) to feed that little baby mini-black hole till it instantly > > grows up to SWALLOW THE EARTH. > > > 2010: BEFORE EINSTEIN, GUSKZ. > > more and more you prove that you are not intelligent > and totally unworthy of learning or doing science. > > r.y this is kind of your personal opinion man, beside that, you said nothing at all related, good bye
From: BURT on 29 Jun 2010 16:03 On Jun 29, 12:58 pm, tue <tu...(a)dcemail.com> wrote: > On Jun 29, 7:44 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10430234.stm > > > "It would be absolutely, fantastically exciting if we produced black > > holes at the LHC," he said. > > > Yes, all ye gluttens, especially Aunt Al, that said there wasn't > > enough energy to produce ANY size black holes. > > -------------------------- > > > Science already established that Black Holes can feed off of both Heat > > & Light (CMBR-Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation). > > > And Science already established (in the 90s) that the force of charge > > is an exchange of virtual particles (photons). > > > ------------ > > **I** AM telling you there's enough heat and virtual particles > > (photons) to feed that little baby mini-black hole till it instantly > > grows up to SWALLOW THE EARTH. > > > 2010: BEFORE EINSTEIN, GUSKZ. > > a 10 cm cube of black hole cannot swallow a big earth > > stephan hawking is wrong, you are safe > > you need a much larger mouth of a black hole in order > to swallow the entire earth > > good bye- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - At the center of a black hole there should be zero gravity. If its true for the gravity of the Earth's center it ought always to be true. Mitch Raemsch
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Lorentz factor in rotating black holes Next: The DEVIL in Europe's LHC proton collider |