From: Bill on
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:20:43 +0000 (UTC), Steve Pope wrote:

> Any advice? Thanks.

I'm a different "Bill" than the fellow that responded earlier in this
thread.

During the installation of KAV 2010 (AV, not the "suite") on my
machines, IIRC, KAV detected that I had Spybot S&D installed, and it
reported the two would conflict; and to uninstall Spybot S&D before
proceeding. This was ~ 5-6 months ago, and the details are pretty hazy.

--
Email address is a Spam trap.
From: Steve Pope on
Bill <2k7508(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>During the installation of KAV 2010 (AV, not the "suite") on my
>machines, IIRC, KAV detected that I had Spybot S&D installed, and it
>reported the two would conflict; and to uninstall Spybot S&D before
>proceeding. This was ~ 5-6 months ago, and the details are pretty hazy.

Thanks. I have heard this will happen, but it did not happen to me.

I did however turn off Spybot's real-time protection during the
KAV 2010 install, and turned it back on afterwards. So far, no
conflict.

I've now proceeded to my second KAV 2010 install, on a lower-configuration
netbook. For that one, I deleted Spybot and installed Malwarebytes
instead on advice from a colleague. That one seems stable but it does bog
down seriously during a KAV scan.

Steve
From: Roy on
On Jul 22, 4:50 am, spop...(a)speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote:
> Roy  <royba...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >As far as Kaspersky 2010 products are concerned whether its the AV or
> >the KIS they have the peculiarity that if your PC had a RAM of just
> >256mb, the scanning will take 100% of the CPU resources, the same
> >thing I experienced with the latest AVGs that the PC seems to hang for
> >quite a time.
> >I tried increasing the RAM to 512mb and the scanning time takes about
> >half of the CPU resources and seems to improve the situation meaning
> >it has something to do with the RAM capacity.
> >I had complained this peculiarity to the kaspersky forum and all the
> >experts there suggested to the same direction that  the latest version
> >of kaspersky is best if the memory is higher than 256mb.......
> >and in fact with a PC that has a RAM of 1 Gb the performance was a lot
> >better....
>
> Thanks.
>
> The machine I installed it on have 2 gigs of RAM; the other two
> I hope to install it on each have one gig.
>
> Steve

I think there are more issues that you need to consider and that needs
more ideas ..... if you visit on kaspersky forum and register you can
freely ask every question related to kaspesk products
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Hitman Pro 3 3.5.6.106
Next: Anti-virus mechanisms