Leica to release and affordable camera
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Canon 20D- Err 99
Next: Maundy Thursday Photo
From: Savageduck on 2 Apr 2010 08:39 On 2010-04-02 01:36:26 -0700, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens(a)sum.co.nz> said: > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:49:07 -0700, Savageduck > <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > >> On 2010-04-01 21:16:36 -0700, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens(a)sum.co.nz> said: >> >>> >>> See the following URL >>> >>> http://enticingthelight.com/2010/04/01/leica-to-release-an-affordable-camera/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Eric Stevens >> >> ...er let's see. >> >> "I have a friend, who is married to another friend. He heard stuff from >> some mysterious German. Now the friend heard something else through >> underground radio. Now I have this theory, which I feel is supported >> because he had heard all of this from a Leica Canada contact who would >> reveal nothing." >> >> The photo of the camera looks like a mocked up M9 to me. >> >> April 1, 2010 is almost over. > > I'm not certain. > > "Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-04-02 03:47:00" > > If its meant to be April 1, its a near miss. ....er no. He was right on target. You managed to post it here on April 1, 2010, and you got sucked in with the story. You are in NZ after all and your posting time here in California was 2010-04-01 21:17:42. The IDL spoiled the joke for you. All it means is you got to it late. If you read his actual post date in the blog entry you might have got the clue. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: Savageduck on 2 Apr 2010 08:42 On 2010-04-02 01:48:17 -0700, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> said: > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:49:07 -0700, Savageduck > <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > >> http://enticingthelight.com/2010/04/01/leica-to-release-an-affordable-camera/ > > > April Fool. Yup. Eric certainly was. You might have noticed I tried to give him the clue in my post. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: Bruce on 2 Apr 2010 13:56 On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 05:42:02 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >On 2010-04-02 01:48:17 -0700, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> said: > >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:49:07 -0700, Savageduck >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >> >>> http://enticingthelight.com/2010/04/01/leica-to-release-an-affordable-camera/ >> >> >> April Fool. > >Yup. >Eric certainly was. You might have noticed I tried to give him the clue >in my post. I'm sorry, I thought my reply was to the OP, not to you. I was in too much of a rush before today's wedding, now thankfully over except for my assistant who is covering the evening's celebrations on her own. ;-)
From: Eric Stevens on 2 Apr 2010 23:19
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 05:39:43 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >On 2010-04-02 01:36:26 -0700, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens(a)sum.co.nz> said: > >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:49:07 -0700, Savageduck >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2010-04-01 21:16:36 -0700, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens(a)sum.co.nz> said: >>> >>>> >>>> See the following URL >>>> >>>> http://enticingthelight.com/2010/04/01/leica-to-release-an-affordable-camera/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Eric Stevens >>> >>> ...er let's see. >>> >>> "I have a friend, who is married to another friend. He heard stuff from >>> some mysterious German. Now the friend heard something else through >>> underground radio. Now I have this theory, which I feel is supported >>> because he had heard all of this from a Leica Canada contact who would >>> reveal nothing." >>> >>> The photo of the camera looks like a mocked up M9 to me. >>> >>> April 1, 2010 is almost over. >> >> I'm not certain. >> >> "Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-04-02 03:47:00" >> >> If its meant to be April 1, its a near miss. > >...er no. >He was right on target. You managed to post it here on April 1, 2010, >and you got sucked in with the story. You are in NZ after all and your >posting time here in California was 2010-04-01 21:17:42. The IDL >spoiled the joke for you. >All it means is you got to it late. If you read his actual post date in >the blog entry you might have got the clue. I wasn't going by the date when I got it. I was going by the date embedded in the script which generated the page. Eric Stevens |