Linux X demo
in [ASM]
|
Prev: masm linking from console
Next: NASM HelloWorld - DOS
From: Betov on 29 Jul 2007 12:01 Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> �crivait news:87k5sjxl3y.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org: > I occasionally wonder what I'm missing by having Randy in > my killfile Easy: The fun. :) Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: rhyde on 29 Jul 2007 17:59 On Jul 29, 8:37 am, santosh <santosh....(a)gmail.com> wrote: > rh...(a)cs.ucr.edu wrote: > > On Jul 29, 7:52 am, "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h...(a)nowhere.cmm> wrote: > >> "Phil Carmody" <thefatphil_demun...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > > >>news:877ioj1qmv.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org... > >> > "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h...(a)nowhere.cmm> writes: > >> > > "Phil Carmody" <thefatphil_demun...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > >> > >news:873aze5gms.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org... > >> > > > Well, it does say that ``la[--i]'' is to be evaluated before > >> > > ``la[--i]=i''. > > >> > > True, that is stated. > > >> > > > It also says that ``--i'' is to be evalutate before ``la[--i]''. > > >> > > False, that is unstated. But, it is a logical corollary to 'la[--i]' > >> being > >> > > evaluated. > > >> > > > That much I evidently have no issue with. > > >> > > > It does *not* say that ``la[--i]'' is to be evaluated before ``i''. > > >> > > True, that is unstated. But, if it where stated, that would > >> > > contradict conditions of 'la[--i]' being evaluated prior to > >> > > 'la[--i]=i'. > > >> > > It says 'la[--i]' is to be evaluated before 'la[--i]=i'. I.e., '--i' > >> must > >> > > be evaluated prior to 'i' to maintain precedence: > > >> > Utter utter nonsense. Your "i.e." contains no valid logic at all. > > >> It's called precedence. The primary expression 'la[--i]' must be > >> evaluated before the much lower precedence 'la[--i]=i'. > > > Careful Phil, > > The statement you're responding to is from Rod Pemberton. Whoops! My bad.
From: Wolfgang Kern on 30 Jul 2007 05:47 Betov �crivait >> I occasionally wonder what I'm missing by having Randy in >> my killfile > > Easy: The fun. > > :) > > Betov. It's not always that funny Rene,... When Randy stated that he downloaded KESYS this invoked a hell of expenses and wasted precious time of many good people. Some of my clients are extremely sensible to possible security leaks, and therfore we checked on his status and income ... But it seems not worth to sue him for spreading out lies just to make himself look more important. Just a poor broom-holder who dream about being a great teacher. __ wolfgang
From: Betov on 30 Jul 2007 06:41 "Wolfgang Kern" <nowhere(a)never.at> �crivait news:f8kcl3$mmk$2 @newsreader2.utanet.at: > > Betov �crivait > >>> I occasionally wonder what I'm missing by having Randy in >>> my killfile >> >> Easy: The fun. >> >> :) >> >> Betov. > > It's not always that funny Rene,... > When Randy stated that he downloaded KESYS this invoked a hell > of expenses and wasted precious time of many good people. > Some of my clients are extremely sensible to possible security > leaks, and therfore we checked on his status and income ... > > But it seems not worth to sue him for spreading out lies just > to make himself look more important. > Just a poor broom-holder who dream about being a great teacher. Agrea. But i was just talking about having him in the KillFile, which is evidently not any solution to the problem. Fact is that this criminal will *never* stop his propaganda system, nor his attacks on other's products. So, as long as this swindler's propaganda system includes a strategy which is based on *quantity* and *repetition*, for the simple reason that there are always new comers who could fall into the trap, it is necessary, halas, to answer to those bullshits. For example, you can demonstrate as many times as you'd like, that an HLL cannot be any Assembler, he will *never* stop twisting the definitions in order to match with his swindling. So, each month, we will have to do the very same and never ended job of explaining (because of the new comers), what an Assembler is and is not. So is it. Then, best is to make fun of it... Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: Wolfgang Kern on 30 Jul 2007 07:18
Right Rene, > So, each month, we will have to do the very same and never ended > job of explaining (because of the new comers), what an Assembler > is and is not. > > So is it. Then, best is to make fun of it... We better watch and react in time. I may laugh about all the nonsense a bit later ... for now I'm heavy upset for loosing money by nothing than checking on the idiot's lies. At least someone else will now watch every of his steps for a while. I could have ignored his statement, but security of clients data is just the top priority of the whole KESYS project. __ wolfgang |