From: Paul H on
I write code using the last version of MicroFocus COBOL (3.1) that produces
..EXEs that do not need the MicroFocus run-time "for fee" support package.
I'm old, I'm honest, and I'm good... TIA, Paul

From: Alistair Maclean on
On Jun 28, 4:00 am, "Paul H" <NoSpamphobergNoS...(a)att.net> wrote:
> I write code using the last version of MicroFocus COBOL (3.1) that produces
> .EXEs that do not need the MicroFocus run-time "for fee" support package.
> I'm old, I'm honest, and I'm good...  TIA, Paul

And you didn't state which country/state/county you are in, hourly
rate (or are you giving it away for free?), etc. Good luck.
From: Paul H on
Dallas TX, but with Skype and other tools, geography isn't an issue. Not
free, but very cheap. $25 or maybe even $20, because I work at home - no
commuting costs.

"Alistair Maclean" <alistair.j.l.maclean(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:522adcfd-d268-4340-a865-5669492ec4a3(a)c33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 28, 4:00 am, "Paul H" <NoSpamphobergNoS...(a)att.net> wrote:
> I write code using the last version of MicroFocus COBOL (3.1) that
> produces
> .EXEs that do not need the MicroFocus run-time "for fee" support package.
> I'm old, I'm honest, and I'm good... TIA, Paul

And you didn't state which country/state/county you are in, hourly
rate (or are you giving it away for free?), etc. Good luck.