From: James Silverton on
Hello All!

I have MacAfee and did not notice any problems on my non-networked
machine. The only unusual thing is that they downloaded *two* separate
"updates" on Wednesday that I applied at 3PM and 7PM.

--


James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

Email, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

From: LD55ZRA on
James Silverton wrote:

> Hello All!
>
> I have MacAfee and did not notice any problems on my non-networked
> machine. The only unusual thing is that they downloaded *two* separate
> "updates" on Wednesday that I applied at 3PM and 7PM.
>
The second update is to fix the glitch caused by the first update on
some systems: They call this glitch as: "Blue screen or DCOM error".

<http://vil.nai.com/vil/5958_false.htm>

hth


--
THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY
KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA
OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER
INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF
BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS
ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL
DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.

Copyright LD55ZRA 2010.

From: David H. Lipman on
From: "James Silverton" <not.jim.silverton(a)verizon.net>

| Hello All!

| I have MacAfee and did not notice any problems on my non-networked
| machine. The only unusual thing is that they downloaded *two* separate
| "updates" on Wednesday that I applied at 3PM and 7PM.

Hi James:

The second update was for DAT 5959 which addressed a False Positive of 'W32/Wecorl.a'
detected in %windir%\system32\svchost.exe by DAT 5958.


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: James Silverton on
David wrote to James Silverton on Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:24:59 -0400:

|> Hello All!

|> I have MacAfee and did not notice any problems on my
|> non-networked machine. The only unusual thing is that they
|> downloaded *two* separate "updates" on Wednesday that I
|> applied at 3PM and 7PM.

> Hi James:

> The second update was for DAT 5959 which addressed a False
> Positive of 'W32/Wecorl.a' detected in
> %windir%\system32\svchost.exe by DAT 5958.

Thanks and thanks also to LD55CRA! I had a suspicion that the double
update might be caused by that but, AFAICT, the first one did not screw
up my machine and it seems we a back to one update a day.


--

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

From: James Silverton on
James wrote to David H. Lipman on Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:50:26 -0400:

|>> Hello All!

|>> I have MacAfee and did not notice any problems on my
|>> non-networked machine. The only unusual thing is that they
|>> downloaded *two* separate "updates" on Wednesday that I
|>> applied at 3PM and 7PM.

>> Hi James:

>> The second update was for DAT 5959 which addressed a False
>> Positive of 'W32/Wecorl.a' detected in
>> %windir%\system32\svchost.exe by DAT 5958.

> Thanks and thanks also to LD55CRA! I had a suspicion that the double
> update might be caused by that but, AFAICT, the first
> one did not screw up my machine and it seems we a back to one update a
> day.

McAfee seems worried about this problem since I just got a message
asking me to check for updates. As I expected, I was "up to date."

--

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not