Prev: Why do we need cameras like the D700 or D3s?
Next: How to fix tiny tear in camera bag before it widens?
From: George Kerby on 22 Feb 2010 11:34



On 2/21/10 6:26 PM, in article 4b81cf43$0$1594$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net, "Ray
Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote:

> George Kerby <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/20/10 9:19 PM, in article 4b80a632$0$1633$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net, "Ray
>> Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 2:15�pm, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>> RichA �<rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> And this one is only 45 megapixels, not 60.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rich is an idiot who thinks that image quality is the ONLY
>>>>> consideration. �Except, of course, when it comes to his own wallet.
>>>>>
>>>>>> �Interesting thing, I'd
>>>>>> have expected going from 12-24 megapixels to show at least a great a
>>>>>> detail jump as going from 24-48 megapixels, but that isn't the case
>>>>>> here.
>>>>>
>>>>> And it's kind of hard to do sports photography at less than one frame
>>>>> per second.
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=30419028
>>>>
>>>> High quality landscape work, studio product shots, the medium format
>>>> clobbers the FX.
>>>
>>> Bullshit. Medium-format cameras are specialized cameras with limited
>>> uses.
>>
>> Speakith the
>
> Go away, idiot. Try again when you have something other than your
> screeching hate to contribute.

You are like the little kindergarten child, who, when presented the truth,
starts screaming "NAW-NAW! NO - NO!!! Naw! NOOOOO!!!", while covering his
ears and stamping his little feet.

Fish-Head Rot, it is YOU who needs to look in the mirror for the
non-contributor.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Why do we need cameras like the D700 or D3s?
Next: How to fix tiny tear in camera bag before it widens?