From: RichA on
On Jun 14, 5:42 pm, Bowser <Ca...(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://dpreview.com/news/1006/10061402nikoniss.asp
>
> Maybe they've "shunned" other brands because of the massive inventory
> of Nikon gear they've accumulated.

They won't be cobbling old legacy lenses on those bodies, so the old
gear has nothing to do with anything.

From: Robert Coe on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
: http://dpreview.com/news/1006/10061402nikoniss.asp

Why should it matter to any of us what equipment NASA uses?

Bob
From: Ray Fischer on
RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>http://dpreview.com/news/1006/10061402nikoniss.asp

Odd. I didn't know that the "Russian segment of the
International Space Station" was NASA.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: Alfred Molon on
In article <m4td16lmsrlibrngmbiokaj2n5ghrig50b(a)4ax.com>, Robert Coe
says...
> Why should it matter to any of us what equipment NASA uses?

Perhaps NASA only chooses the very best cameras?
--

Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: whisky-dave on

"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c7d7beb1-dc44-405f-b229-db5b5382fc03(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 14, 5:42 pm, Bowser <Ca...(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://dpreview.com/news/1006/10061402nikoniss.asp
>
> Maybe they've "shunned" other brands because of the massive inventory
> of Nikon gear they've accumulated.

They won't be cobbling old legacy lenses on those bodies, so the old
gear has nothing to do with anything.

maybe that got a good part exchange deal, there's a recession on you know
;-)