|
Prev: NEWS: Microsoft's dual-screen booklet shows 'face' on web ? The Register
Next: Call for papers: CCN-10, USA, July 2010
From: John Slade on 6 Mar 2010 20:37 JC Dill wrote: > John Slade wrote: >> The iPad uses watered down everything and I don't know how well it >> will do given the netbook market and how the typical netbook is far >> more powerful and versatile than the iPad. > > Not everyone wants (or needs) the most powerful and versatile item. For > many people, ease of use is far more important, I think ease of use means you can go on the Internet and use every web site without any problem. As it is, the iPad does not support Adobe Flash and a lot of web sites use flash extensively. So right there a more powerful netbook has the advantage of running full versions of Windows 7 or XP and not the mobile versions. I think the iPad is going to compete against the iPod Touch and iPhone as well as netbooks. It may find a niche in the e-book reader market. John
From: SMS on 6 Mar 2010 20:41 John Slade wrote: > JC Dill wrote: >> John Slade wrote: >>> The iPad uses watered down everything and I don't know how well it >>> will do given the netbook market and how the typical netbook is far >>> more powerful and versatile than the iPad. >> >> Not everyone wants (or needs) the most powerful and versatile item. >> For many people, ease of use is far more important, > > I think ease of use means you can go on the Internet and use > every web site without any problem. As it is, the iPad does not support > Adobe Flash and a lot of web sites use flash extensively. Well maybe Apple is the only company that can make a stand against the extensive use of Flash.
From: John Slade on 6 Mar 2010 20:46 SMS wrote: > John Slade wrote: >> John Navas wrote: >>> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/06/microsoft_courier_details_report/> >>> >>> >>> Could be an iPad killer -- Microsoft may have finally got one right. >>> >> >> The iPad is Apple's entry into the Netbook market IMO. I think >> the iPad killer will be better more powerful netbooks that are powered >> by laptop CPUs and graphics. The iPad uses watered down everything and >> I don't know how well it will do given the netbook market and how the >> typical netbook is far more powerful and versatile than the iPad. > > I bet the iPad is going to be a _huge_ seller. It's not a netbook > competitor (that's the MacBook Air), it's a whole new segment. > If you saw the keynote speech where Jobs introduced it, you can easily see it's targeted at the netbook market. Even before that Jobs was telling reporters he was working on a netbook-type device. > iPad is going to be huge in the kids market. iPhone users probably won't > buy it because they don't want to pay another $30 a month in addition to > the $70+/month they are already paying. At least there's a lot of apps > that are more than just games, unlike the Nintendo DS/DSi. I don't see the iPad being big in the "kids' market" because of it's price and capabilities. More popular games are on cheaper devices more suited to gaming. I can see the iPad being more successful in the e-book reader market if the price comes down. > > If someone figures out how to get a USB port onto it it could have a lot > of vertical market applications as well. It comes with a USB port via the adapter that comes with it. John
From: SMS on 6 Mar 2010 21:06 John Slade wrote: > I don't see the iPad being big in the "kids' market" because of > it's price and capabilities. More popular games are on cheaper devices > more suited to gaming. I can see the iPad being more successful in the > e-book reader market if the price comes down. I'm sure you're going to be proven wrong. Parents spend $1000-1500 on DVD systems for their kids to watch movies in the car. $500 to keep the kids busy in the car, and then having the iPad to use at the destination via WiFi (instead of carrying a laptop) is going to make it the must-have kid's toy of 2010. > > It comes with a USB port via the adapter that comes with it. No it doesn't. It's not a USB host port. You can't plug in various peripherals that the vertical market needs, like bar code scanners, cameras, blood glucose meters, scales, blood-pressure cuffs, etc.. Apple is not interested in those vertical markets because they don't involve selling apps, music, videos, and books to the buyers.
From: JC Dill on 7 Mar 2010 01:59 Jeff Liebermann wrote: > It's very rare when a new product niche is actually used in the manner > the manufacturer intended. A photographer friend thinks the iPad will be used as a portable portfolio display device for photographers. We won't need to make portfolio books anymore, just load photos into a slideshow application on the iPad and click play. It will be easy (perhaps too easy) to carry multiple portfolios, each with a different type of image (e.g. landscapes, weddings, sports). jc
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: NEWS: Microsoft's dual-screen booklet shows 'face' on web ? The Register Next: Call for papers: CCN-10, USA, July 2010 |