From: SMS on
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:12:08 -0800, John Navas
> <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/06/microsoft_courier_details_report/>
>>
>> Could be an iPad killer -- Microsoft may have finally got one right.
>
> It was also leaked about 6 months ago. Nothing happened:
> <http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/09/23/microsoft_courier/>
> It sure looks nice. However, since it's Zune based (WinCE 6), my
> guess(tm) is that there will be copious legal limitations and
> entanglements limiting user installed software, music, user created

It doesn't matter how great the hardware is, where are the apps?

The iPad is going to be the 2010 "educational" toy and entertainment
device sitter that parents buy their kids. Those kids with a Nintendo
DSi in the car will be so 2009. The Microsoft product, if it's real, is
going to be more of a product used for actual work.

> apps, etc. Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for Microsoft Surface:

Microsoft Surface has been in commercial use for several years already.
From: JC Dill on
SMS wrote:

> Microsoft Surface has been in commercial use for several years already.

Is this the software we are seeing on large screen TVs in TV newsrooms
where the reporter is using pinching and swiping movements to shrink and
move various windows? I've seen a lot of this in the past few weeks on
the news and on some tech TV dramas (CSI? or similar).

jc
From: John Slade on
John Navas wrote:
> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/06/microsoft_courier_details_report/>
>
> Could be an iPad killer -- Microsoft may have finally got one right.
>

The iPad is Apple's entry into the Netbook market IMO. I
think the iPad killer will be better more powerful netbooks that
are powered by laptop CPUs and graphics. The iPad uses watered
down everything and I don't know how well it will do given the
netbook market and how the typical netbook is far more powerful
and versatile than the iPad.

John
From: JC Dill on
John Slade wrote:
> The iPad uses watered down everything and I
> don't know how well it will do given the netbook market and how the
> typical netbook is far more powerful and versatile than the iPad.

Not everyone wants (or needs) the most powerful and versatile item. For
many people, ease of use is far more important, and this is where
Apple's design often excels over other items in the marketplace. The
reason the iPod became the dominant mp3 player was because it is easy to
use - not just to play music but also to load/buy music. The reason the
iPhone has become such a dominant phone/web/music appliance is again,
it's very easy to use, including an easy way to add applications. If
Apple is as successful with the iPad's design, there's every reason to
believe that a large percent of the market will find "easy to use" and
"powerful enough" to be compelling reasons to buy, trumping "more
powerful" and "more versatile" but harder to use products from other
computer manufacturers.

jc


From: SMS on
John Slade wrote:
> John Navas wrote:
>> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/06/microsoft_courier_details_report/>
>>
>>
>> Could be an iPad killer -- Microsoft may have finally got one right.
>>
>
> The iPad is Apple's entry into the Netbook market IMO. I think
> the iPad killer will be better more powerful netbooks that are powered
> by laptop CPUs and graphics. The iPad uses watered down everything and I
> don't know how well it will do given the netbook market and how the
> typical netbook is far more powerful and versatile than the iPad.

I bet the iPad is going to be a _huge_ seller. It's not a netbook
competitor (that's the MacBook Air), it's a whole new segment.

iPad is going to be huge in the kids market. iPhone users probably won't
buy it because they don't want to pay another $30 a month in addition to
the $70+/month they are already paying. At least there's a lot of apps
that are more than just games, unlike the Nintendo DS/DSi.

If someone figures out how to get a USB port onto it it could have a lot
of vertical market applications as well.