Prev: Photoshop recommendations
Next: Adobe Photoshop the Perfect Tool For Photographers
From: james on 1 Apr 2010 23:13
Opps you are correct. 25 mb

On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 13:40:28 -0400, "Kabuki" <masqued(a)ball.net> wrote:

>
><james(a)uvvm.uvic.ca> wrote in message
>news:ut78r55lbq2g05dip98b7dg212nnkd3r9v(a)4ax.com...
>>I only mean the camera image is 25gb.
>
>you mean MB right? not GB
>I don't think even hasselblad or leica gives a 25 gb image
>
>
>>
>> Just trying to familiarize myself with how much ram, processor, video
>> card etc I need. A lot has changed from my old computer like DDR3,
>> Duo Core, Quad Core, I think they even have a Six Core what ever it is
>> called. I almost get the feeling that laptops are cheaper than a desk
>> top.
>>
>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:32:48 +1300, mike
>> <m.fee(a)irl.cri.replacethiswithnz> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <jf42r5h2lapg2100ffd3hnn2d51i99tfgt(a)4ax.com>,
>>>james(a)uvvm.uvic.ca says...
>>>> I have a seven year old PC and it is time to replace. Does anyone
>>>> have recommendations on the level of PC, ram, operating system etc I
>>>> should buy? Oh I mainly want it for CS4 and working with 25gb images
>>>> with lots of layers. Even Picasa and Bridge are painfully slow when
>>>> viewing all my images.
>>>>
>>>Those are big images. I estimate that a 25 gb image consisting 25 layers
>>>of 16 bit-per-channel RGB data would be around 10,000x10,000 pixels! Or
>>>you could have 1000+ layers of editing if you limited yourself to an
>>>image with resolution typical of a top-end SLR. Could there be a
>>>misprint somewhere, because otherwise it may be difficult to find a PC
>>>architecture that would even allow for 25gb+ of RAM?
>>>
>>>Mike
>
>
>
>--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Photoshop recommendations
Next: Adobe Photoshop the Perfect Tool For Photographers