PMA a COMPLETE BUST!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: curanzia versicherung, berufsunf�higkeits versicherung, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung f�r selbst�ndige, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung preis, versicherung vergleich,
Next: LA Zoo over the top?
From: Robert Spanjaard on 24 Feb 2010 13:26 On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:26:15 -0500, John A. wrote: >>> Olympus sp590uz...but there is no blurring >> >>There could be a 5-pixel shake but it would be invisible reduced like >>that. A crop? > > A troll, actually. The infamous P&S Troll. Stick around a bit and you'll > learn to recognize it. Val Hallah is NOT the P&S troll. -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: David J. Littleboy on 2 Mar 2010 14:35 "Val Hallah" <michaelnewport(a)yahoo.com> wrote: On Mar 2, 5:14 pm, Paul Furman <pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote: > Val Hallah wrote: > > Paul Furman wrote: > > >> Sure. > >> Sorry I didn't intend to pick on you, the troll got me riled on this > >> issue. A reduced image does not really say anything though. > > > et viola! > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/41438729(a)N05/4400738576/ > > Better, although that's still a 4x reduction. blame flickr <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Nah. Blame the bloke who uses flickr. http://www.pbase.com/davidjl/image/120719456/original -- David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan
From: Paul Furman on 2 Mar 2010 17:26 David J. Littleboy wrote: > "Val Hallah"<michaelnewport(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 2, 5:14 pm, Paul Furman<pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote: >> Val Hallah wrote: >>> Paul Furman wrote: >> >>>> Sure. >>>> Sorry I didn't intend to pick on you, the troll got me riled on this >>>> issue. A reduced image does not really say anything though. >> >>> et viola! >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/41438729(a)N05/4400738576/ >> >> Better, although that's still a 4x reduction. > > blame flickr > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Ah, not a paid account I guess... I'm glad to post if you want or just do a 1024 pixel crop. > Nah. Blame the bloke who uses flickr. > > http://www.pbase.com/davidjl/image/120719456/original Yeah but that's 40mm, not 676mm <g>.
From: Val Hallah on 3 Mar 2010 01:10
On Mar 2, 11:26 pm, Paul Furman <pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote: > David J. Littleboy wrote: > > "Val Hallah"<michaelnewp...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Mar 2, 5:14 pm, Paul Furman<pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote: > >> Val Hallah wrote: > >>> Paul Furman wrote: > > >>>> Sure. > >>>> Sorry I didn't intend to pick on you, the troll got me riled on this > >>>> issue. A reduced image does not really say anything though. > > >>> et viola! > >>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/41438729(a)N05/4400738576/ > > >> Better, although that's still a 4x reduction. > > > blame flickr > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > Ah, not a paid account I guess... I'm glad to post if you want or just > do a 1024 pixel crop. > > > Nah. Blame the bloke who uses flickr. > > >http://www.pbase.com/davidjl/image/120719456/original > > Yeah but that's 40mm, not 676mm <g>. indeed, not a paid account, but, I ticked the box that says do not resize |