Ping: David Kaye
in [Windows Viruses]
|
From: ~BD~ on 17 Apr 2010 04:01 David H. Lipman wrote: >> >> They weren't Easter bunnies. It was soft p.o.r.n. It was >> inappropriate for the Malkwarebyte forums and the religious >> Christians were offended. What rubbish! Most certainly there was no reason for banning me from the Malwarebytes forums, that's for sure. There's something that doesn't quite ring true about an organisation which does not correspond in a civilised manner with the users of its product. Maybe someone like David Kaye has the experience to determine if a machine is actually *clean* after installing and running MBAM. Someone, surely, has carried out an independent check to give such a widely used facility a clean bill of health. Whilst MBAM is obviously highly effective at removing 'malware' why is it considered impossible for the downloaded software to leave its *own* gremlin within the cleaned machine? Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite reference. -- Dave - seeking only the truth!
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Infected XP owners left unpatched Next: Ping: David Kaye |