From: Anonymous on 17 Apr 2010 04:27
"~BD~" <BoaterDaveNoSpam(a)Hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:hqbpth$4k2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> They weren't Easter bunnies. It was soft p.o.r.n. It was
>>> inappropriate for the Malkwarebyte forums and the religious
>>> Christians were offended.
> What rubbish!
> Most certainly there was no reason for banning me from the Malwarebytes
> forums, that's for sure.
> There's something that doesn't quite ring true about an organisation
> which does not correspond in a civilised manner with the users of its
> Maybe someone like David Kaye has the experience to determine if a
> machine is actually *clean* after installing and running MBAM. Someone,
> surely, has carried out an independent check to give such a widely used
> facility a clean bill of health. Whilst MBAM is obviously highly
> effective at removing 'malware' why is it considered impossible for the
> downloaded software to leave its *own* gremlin within the cleaned
> Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite
> Dave - seeking only the truth!