From: Bob Techentin on
As many of you know, I worked with a team of undergraduate students
last year on refactoring portions of the BLT toolkit so that it would
work with Tcl/Tk 8.4, 8.5, and beyond. I was particularly interested
in the vectors and graphs, as that is what we use. I also asked the
team to work on winop (for snap) and the embedded eps portions. The
team delivered binaries and source code last May, and it seemed to
work. But as I dug a little deeper, there were some build
dependencies, and the automated tests didn't work quite the way I
expected. I've managed to do a little more tweaking, and I think that
it is ready for an alpha release.

http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/rbctoolkit/

RBC is:
- BLT's vector, graph, barchart, stripchart, winop, and eps
components
- TEA compliant
- 3800+ automated test suite, plus many more manual tests
- Works (for me) on win32, linux 32 bit and linux 64 bit, Tcl/Tk 8.4,
8.5, and 8.6beta.

RBC is not (yet):
- documented
- experienced
- beautiful (see pkgIndex.tcl for an example)
- free from Tcl/Tk internals
- including Zoom-Stack
- tested with starkits

But if you're willing to try it out, I'd be more than happy to accept
any feedback. Please use the sf.net trackers to document issues or
problems.

Thanks,
Bob Techentin
--
techentin.robert(a)mayo.edu


From: Will Duquette on
On Oct 11, 8:34 am, Bob Techentin <techentin.rob...(a)mayo.edu> wrote:
> As many of you know, I worked with a team of undergraduate students
> last year on refactoring portions of the BLT toolkit so that it would
> work with Tcl/Tk 8.4, 8.5, and beyond.....

Bob, you rock.
From: MSEdit on

Excellent work Bob and team,

I tried out the stripchart example and it works ok (even in a starpack
win 8.4.12, 8.5.7 and 8.6b1).

I had a problem with another example and will report back when I have
had time to check it out.

Have you kept all the options in the source code for BLT ? the graph
element has -ylow/-yhigh and -weight which although not well
documented are very useful.

Is this based on the blt2.4Z source ?

Martyn


From: Roger O on
I have downloaded this and would like to see what's up. Should I be
able to compile and link a C program against this? If so, how has the
naming been changed from the BLT style? A quick look at the code tells
me this is not a rename-recompile replacement. I understand that there
are no docs. But is there at least a little advice on how one could
try to evaluate it from code that was originally BLT?
From: Bob Techentin on
On Oct 12, 3:20 am, MSEdit <mse...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is this based on the blt2.4Z source ?
>

Yes, RBC is based on BLT 2.4z with both patches applies.

Bob