Prev: Styling ridge borders
Next: Grid. Best approach ...
From: dorayme on 29 Apr 2010 17:14
In article
<Pine.LNX.4.64.1004291654510.13453(a)zen.rrzn.uni-hannover.de>,
Andreas Prilop <prilop4321(a)trashmail.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, dorayme wrote:
>
> >>>>> Testcase:
> >>>>> http://www.user.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/temp-5.html
> >
> > On Mac Opera 10.10, there is no difference between your rtl and
> > ltr tables showing up. Once again, the "bug" that is being found
> > here is dependant on you specifying right-padding in em rather
> > than other units.
>

On Mac Opera 10.10, as on other browsers, there is no difference
between the two tables. That is one thing to get out of the way.
But the left cells in both tables show a wrong implementation, a
bug, in having the padding on the wrong side. Try to forget what
I said above. Please carry on as if it was not said.
>
> > Continue to find this uninteresting.
>
> Yes, because I continue to specify length only in relative units.

This I find surprising. It is correct of you to want to use ems
for padding, I was not criticising this. But being uninterested
in how this bug is possibly confined to font-size units is like
going to the circus to watch the show and then to find it
*uninteresting* that a vicious criminal is escaping from the
police and runs into the tent, there is a shootout, several
police are wounded. He is finally captured by clever and brave
tactics by various individuals, both police and civilians - right
in front of eyes that came to watch circus performers including
lions... Can you never be diverted from anything? I would kill to
obtain that kind of concentration. <g>

--
dorayme
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Styling ridge borders
Next: Grid. Best approach ...