Prev: [Samba] XP clients cannot find profile after logout when re-login
Next: [Samba] Windows Vista and option in smb.conf
From: live.fx on 14 Mar 2010 12:40



Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
>
>> I use "socket options" because 99% places in Internet recommends this,
>> and
>> no one say about "modern kernels" - really. You are first :) And of
>> course,
>> this options not give me any visible effect.
>>
>>
>
> The problem with the information on the Internet is that it persists,
> even if it is no longer correct. So, when you look for information there
> you have to watch *when* was this information produced and whether it
> still applies. And no, I am not the first to say that. If you search
> this mailing list's archives for "socket options" you will find this
> warning countless times: "*Don't use socket options* unless you have a
> very good reason for doing so".
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>

I`m about "google search". Most results is about "samba performance tuning"
and contain "socket options" improvements.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Samba-3.5-slow.-Help-with-benchmarks-%21-tp27894473p27896126.html
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Miguel Medalha on 14 Mar 2010 12:50

> I`m about "google search". Most results is about "samba performance tuning"
> and contain "socket options" improvements.
>

I just did a search in Google and I also found the warnings about the
use of "sockect options" with Linux kernel 2.6. So, I suppose that one
finds what one is looking for...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: John Drescher on 14 Mar 2010 12:50
> I`m about "google search". Most results is about "samba performance tuning"
> and contain "socket options" improvements.
>

Socket options will not quadruple your speed.

>

I would start by investigating the reason for slowness. Is this with
small files? What performance do you get for a 4GB file? Could
permissions be slowing you down? Could it be the raid?

John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: John Drescher on 14 Mar 2010 12:50
> I just did a search in Google and I also found the warnings about the use of
> "sockect options" with Linux kernel 2.6. So, I suppose that one finds what
> one is looking for...
> --
I have seen enough recommendations not to mess with the socket options
on modern kernels.

John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Helmut Hullen on 14 Mar 2010 13:20
Hallo, John,

Du meintest am 14.03.10:

>> I just did a search in Google and I also found the warnings about
>> the use of "sockect options" with Linux kernel 2.6. So, I suppose
>> that one finds what one is looking for...

> I have seen enough recommendations not to mess with the socket
> options on modern kernels.

Give a man a switch, and he'll switch!

Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: [Samba] XP clients cannot find profile after logout when re-login
Next: [Samba] Windows Vista and option in smb.conf