From: dpb on
Tim Prince wrote:
> Terence wrote:
>> Would someone like to write to Google and offer to moderate this Forum
>> from the Google -access viewpoint?
>>
>> Apparently one can write to Google about a non-owned Forum and request
>> or offer delete privileges (can be a shared duty). Then you aprove or
>> not the new day's items.
> Being in close proximity to Google, and using individual.net since news
> servers in our state were shut down, my news reader tends to save me the
> trouble of seeing Google spam, while letting through a much higher
> proportion of good stuff. You'd have to find someone with a reliable
> news feed but no filtering, if any such thing exists.

Any number of them for pay and some free have at least reasonable
filtering...

news.eternal-september.org
news.aioe.org

are two of the free newsservers I've used.

--
From: Tim Prince on
aeroguy wrote:
> On Dec 23, 3:23 am, Terence <tbwri...(a)cantv.net> wrote:
>> Would someone like to write to Google and offer to moderate this Forum
>> from the Google -access viewpoint?
>>
>> Apparently one can write to Google about a non-owned Forum and request
>> or offer delete privileges (can be a shared duty). Then you aprove or
>> not the new day's items.
>
> If anything like this exists, i would like to share the
> responsibility....
> BUt i think this is a Usenet group and this kind of moderation is not
> available... just guessing though.
>
I think Terence means Google allowing someone to moderate what comes to
the newsgroup from their site. Don't really understand why they won't do
some automatic filtering for anyone but their own people. They send
more spam here than even cantv.net does.
From: Arjan on
I just sent a request to groups-support(a)google.com to check our status
and take action. Don't know if this address, which I took from the
FAQ, points into the right direction. In case more than nothing
returns, you'll be the first to know!

A.
From: user1 on
feenberg wrote:
> On Dec 22, 5:23 pm, Terence<tbwri...(a)cantv.net> wrote:
>> Would someone like to write to Google and offer to moderate this Forum
>> from the Google -access viewpoint?
>>
>> Apparently one can write to Google about a non-owned Forum and request
>> or offer delete privileges (can be a shared duty). Then you aprove or
>> not the new day's items.
>
> Before October 5th of 2009 spam in the Google Groups version of
> comp.lang.fortran was always removed within 24 hours, and was not a
> serious problem. No spam messages have been removed since that date
> from comp.lang.fortran, although many other Usenet groups sill get
> cleaned up promptly.

Not so. The spam complaint threads posted here go well before that date.
A large amount of spam, stuff that had been around for some time, was in
fact deleted in late September. Some people were on the verge of
rejoicing. Sadly, more has been slowly accumulating.






From: aeroguy on
On Dec 24, 1:01 am, Arjan <arjan.van.d...(a)rivm.nl> wrote:
> I just sent a request to groups-supp...(a)google.com to check our status
> and take action. Don't know if this address, which I took from the
> FAQ, points into the right direction. In case more than nothing
> returns, you'll be the first to know!
>
> A.

One simple option that google can impliment to combat span is , if the
message contains a link. It should be moderated...or someone posting
should get a CAPTCHA code they must enter.

Since most of the span is link related, thats the door google should
block!!!

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Why it is forbidden?
Next: class