VOPS
in [Visual Objects]
|
Prev: Help ! Valkyrie 5 - Vpll.exe
Next: ComboBox:setfocus()
From: Doering B. on 13 Nov 2005 11:15 After reading all the statements - here are mine -hope easier to read than others -hope easier to understand than others -hope more helpful than others :-) and first - for some persons here... -I'm not in love with Brian or any other member of the DevTeam -I'm not getting money from GrafX -I'm not known as a person - making hasty decisions I was at Cologne I heard news about VO and Vulcan I saw news about Vulcan I must - and therefore will - go on with VO-Apps for the next 2-5 years I must - and therefore will - switch to .NET for new applications I should -and therefore will - switch to .NET for older applications - if it's possible (mainly customer-decision) For me, switching from VO32 to .NET should be -as easy as possible -as compatible as possible -as inexpensive as possible Rewriting all applications in C++/# is impossible Timelines for VO2.8 and Vulcan are - for me - ok What I've seen and heard at Cologne was better than many years of CA-VO. Since Cologne - I can't find a reason NOT to subscribe to VOPS Buying Vulcan and upgrade VO next year will cost a certain amount of money Sum up - and I can get -contact to GrafX (the closer - the better) -bugfixes for VO (the earlier - the better) -new info and releases for Vulcan (=.NET=almost new world=needs some time to get practice=the earlier-the better) nearly for free And last but not least - some persons should remember - they are here - because they are programming in VO. They are important for this forum - because they have much experience and knowledge in programming. They are not here for discussing like GER/"Erbsenzähler und bockige Kinder" :-)
From: N.Coppernigk on 13 Nov 2005 11:49 > Von: "Doering B." <cbb.doer...(a)doering.info> > I heard news about VO ..... I totally agree with you. and its sad that theese newsrgoup now is a GER/"Meckerkasten". But. What is new in VO2.8 ? Bye Niclas
From: Meinhard Schnoor-Matriciani on 13 Nov 2005 11:53 Well said. "Doering B." <cbb.doering(a)doering.info> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:1131898545.594225.176430(a)g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... After reading all the statements - here are mine -hope easier to read than others -hope easier to understand than others -hope more helpful than others :-) and first - for some persons here... -I'm not in love with Brian or any other member of the DevTeam -I'm not getting money from GrafX -I'm not known as a person - making hasty decisions I was at Cologne I heard news about VO and Vulcan I saw news about Vulcan I must - and therefore will - go on with VO-Apps for the next 2-5 years I must - and therefore will - switch to .NET for new applications I should -and therefore will - switch to .NET for older applications - if it's possible (mainly customer-decision) For me, switching from VO32 to .NET should be -as easy as possible -as compatible as possible -as inexpensive as possible Rewriting all applications in C++/# is impossible Timelines for VO2.8 and Vulcan are - for me - ok What I've seen and heard at Cologne was better than many years of CA-VO. Since Cologne - I can't find a reason NOT to subscribe to VOPS Buying Vulcan and upgrade VO next year will cost a certain amount of money Sum up - and I can get -contact to GrafX (the closer - the better) -bugfixes for VO (the earlier - the better) -new info and releases for Vulcan (=.NET=almost new world=needs some time to get practice=the earlier-the better) nearly for free And last but not least - some persons should remember - they are here - because they are programming in VO. They are important for this forum - because they have much experience and knowledge in programming. They are not here for discussing like GER/"Erbsenz?hler und bockige Kinder" :-)
From: Dave Francis on 13 Nov 2005 12:32 Congratulations on your precise analysis of a relatively simple situation. Why others here, feel they have to hide the simplicity behind an overdose of FUD is beyond me. Dave Francis "Doering B." <cbb.doering(a)doering.info> wrote in message news:1131898545.594225.176430(a)g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... After reading all the statements - here are mine -hope easier to read than others -hope easier to understand than others -hope more helpful than others :-) and first - for some persons here... -I'm not in love with Brian or any other member of the DevTeam -I'm not getting money from GrafX -I'm not known as a person - making hasty decisions I was at Cologne I heard news about VO and Vulcan I saw news about Vulcan I must - and therefore will - go on with VO-Apps for the next 2-5 years I must - and therefore will - switch to .NET for new applications I should -and therefore will - switch to .NET for older applications - if it's possible (mainly customer-decision) For me, switching from VO32 to .NET should be -as easy as possible -as compatible as possible -as inexpensive as possible Rewriting all applications in C++/# is impossible Timelines for VO2.8 and Vulcan are - for me - ok What I've seen and heard at Cologne was better than many years of CA-VO. Since Cologne - I can't find a reason NOT to subscribe to VOPS Buying Vulcan and upgrade VO next year will cost a certain amount of money Sum up - and I can get -contact to GrafX (the closer - the better) -bugfixes for VO (the earlier - the better) -new info and releases for Vulcan (=.NET=almost new world=needs some time to get practice=the earlier-the better) nearly for free And last but not least - some persons should remember - they are here - because they are programming in VO. They are important for this forum - because they have much experience and knowledge in programming. They are not here for discussing like GER/"Erbsenz?hler und bockige Kinder" :-)
From: Erik Visser on 13 Nov 2005 13:11
Bravo!! Erik |