From: Jdr on

"Jdr" <jdr(a)sxz.net> wrote in message news:83lmgvFpjhU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> I wonder if any one runs CPU higher than 2.40 gigahertz Intel Core 2 Duo
> on ASUSP5B-Deluxe Rev 1.xx ?
> TIA for sharing of your experience.

My apology, I've found the "lost" thread... Thanks Paul again...


"Paul" <nospam(a)needed.com> wrote in message
news:hknh2j$gr$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> McCorkindale wrote:
>>
>> "Paul" <nospam(a)needed.com> wrote in message
>> news:hkmtfh$5pl$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>> McCorkindale wrote:
>>>> I have this mo/bo running Core 2 CPU 6600/ @2.40 GHz for some time
>>>> now
>>>> and I would like to upgrade this CPU. I wonder weather there is
>>>> someone who
>>>> runs this m/b with much faster CPU. Any information on this topic
>>>> will be
>>>> greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> jdr
>>>
>>> It's much more economical to just overclock your Q6600. For the small
>>> step in stock speed you'll get from an upgrade, it just isn't worth it.
>>>
>>> http://support.asus.com.tw/cpusupport/cpusupport.aspx?SLanguage=en-us&model=P5B%20Deluxe
>>>
>>> You should be able to get at least 3GHz from it, by overclocking. You
>>> can look through the reviews here for the Q6600 and see what
>>> ordinary users managed to get from it, by overclocking.
>>>
>>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductReview.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017
>>>
>>> Paul
>>
>>
>> Thank you Paul,
>> Somehow, I'm not convinced that is exactly the same.
>> It depends what want to achieve. I was thinking about
>> replacing the present CPU (Core 2) with core 2 Quad.
>> In this case in want be only speed but in volume as well
>> playing quite important part.
>>
>> But I take your point and see into it.
>>
>> Jdr
>>
>>
>
> OK, so your original processor is an E6600 and not a Q6600.
> My mistake. There is more room to upgrade then.
>
> Additional cores help, if the software you use is multi-core aware,
> and spreads the task over all the cores. Not all software will
> do that. Just so you know what to expect. Some multimedia software
> is multi-core aware, so perhaps some kinds of movie editing or rendering
> applications will run faster.
>
> The fastest reasonably priced processor is the Core 2 Quad Q9550
> 2.83GHz 12MB L2 Cache at $270. Faster than this gets too expensive
> (and you should consider LGA1156 or LGA1366 motherboards and
> processors instead in that case).
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115041
>
> The Q8300 Core 2 Quad 2.5GHz 4MB L2 Cache is $149. It is an
> FSB1333 part. It would give you about double the performance
> with the right application running (and using all cores).
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115207
>
> Looking at the reviews on Newegg for your P5B Deluxe motherboard,
> one person managed to get the FSB clock up to 500 MHz or FSB2000.
> If you started with a FSB1333 processor and got it to run FSB2000,
> you'd have a bit of overclocking headroom. So you might manage to
> squeeze a bit more from your Q8300. It is a 45nm part, so
> watch out for applying too much Vcore boost. Check one
> of the enthusiast sites, to verify the limit is 1.4 volts.
> I think the 45nm processors don't last very long, if you
> give them more voltage than that. Extra voltage is only
> needed if you're trying for a large overclock. If you plan
> to leave it at stock 2.5GHz speed, then there is no need
> for a voltage boost.
>
> Reading the Newegg reviews for the Q8300, it isn't a huge
> overclocker. Maybe somewhere between 2.8Ghz and 3.1GHz or so.
> So between the motherboard and the CPU, the CPU is probably
> the limiting factor to overclocking.
>
> Paul