From: van dark on
I own camera NIKON D50, D200 and CANON 400D. If I use an IR filter, my
cameras doesn�t able measure a correct exposure. The exposure is always
deeply under correct value.
Any suggestion, please?
rene
From: George Kerby on



On 4/17/10 6:58 AM, in article hqc7pq$18he$1(a)ns.felk.cvut.cz, "van dark"
<van.dark(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> I own camera NIKON D50, D200 and CANON 400D. If I use an IR filter, my
> cameras doesn�t able measure a correct exposure. The exposure is always
> deeply under correct value.
> Any suggestion, please?
> rene
Overexpose?

From: van dark on
Very strong underexpose. My estimation - 8 exposition steps.
rene

On 17.4.2010 17:45, George Kerby wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/17/10 6:58 AM, in article hqc7pq$18he$1(a)ns.felk.cvut.cz, "van dark"
> <van.dark(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I own camera NIKON D50, D200 and CANON 400D. If I use an IR filter, my
>> cameras doesn�t able measure a correct exposure. The exposure is always
>> deeply under correct value.
>> Any suggestion, please?
>> rene
> Overexpose?
>
From: me on
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:58:19 +0200, van dark <van.dark(a)yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>I own camera NIKON D50, D200 and CANON 400D. If I use an IR filter, my
>cameras doesn�t able measure a correct exposure. The exposure is always
>deeply under correct value.
>Any suggestion, please?

http://www.naturfotograf.com/D200_rev05IR.html

http://diglloyd.com/dip/index.html

From: van dark on
we were sat in the pub and drink a beer. I swallowed a pill and I
remember "Don't tag an unrelated question....". The thread tags about
"digital". And I, fortunately, speak about digital, guy.
The World is beautiful one. Isn�t it? Dear Sir?

On 20.4.2010 3:47, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
> drugs began to take hold. I remember van dark <van.dark(a)yahoo.co.uk>
> saying something like:
>
>> Any suggestion, please?
>
> Don't tag an unrelated question onto an existing thread.