Prev: FILE_FLAG_POSIX_SEMANTICS question
Next: x86-based VM: code/data sharing and security...
From: io_x on 16 Oct 2009 04:31

"Espineter" <espineter(a)gmail.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:82ef3ca7-45dc-44e8-a04c-7eddd9e688a1(a)g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
<On Oct 11, 12:10 pm, "Esra Sdrawkcab" <ad...(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 02:20:07 +0100, Espineter <espine...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> > Please don't reveal internal secrets of your entry. People can read
> > this public group and:
> > -They can rewrite this code, and position before you only with a byte
> > improvement of this code.
> > -Also is possible extract ideas that can be applied in his entries
>
> io_x has published all (AFAIK) his code here, I've chipped in a few not
> very ground-breaking suggestions. He's still a long way from 150 bytes let
> alone 130 odd.

< Yes. I know it's an "amateur" entry.

yes "amateur"

<It's only a suggestion.
<Probably it's difficult that the rest of the participants read this
<group. I have found googling "hugi compo 29". So I think with some
<easy improvements can be under 160 bytes.

> --
> Nuns! Reverse!


From: Esra Sdrawkcab on 16 Oct 2009 04:34
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:31:09 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote:

>
> "Espineter" <espineter(a)gmail.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:82ef3ca7-45dc-44e8-a04c-7eddd9e688a1(a)g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> <On Oct 11, 12:10 pm, "Esra Sdrawkcab" <ad...(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 02:20:07 +0100, Espineter <espine...(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > Please don't reveal internal secrets of your entry. People can read
>> > this public group and:
>> > -They can rewrite this code, and position before you only with a byte
>> > improvement of this code.
>> > -Also is possible extract ideas that can be applied in his entries
>>
>> io_x has published all (AFAIK) his code here, I've chipped in a few not
>> very ground-breaking suggestions. He's still a long way from 150 bytes
>> let
>> alone 130 odd.
>
> < Yes. I know it's an "amateur" entry.
>
> yes "amateur"
>
Is this because it doesn't use 32bit registers?

> <It's only a suggestion.
> <Probably it's difficult that the rest of the participants read this
> <group. I have found googling "hugi compo 29". So I think with some
> <easy improvements can be under 160 bytes.
>

I had another idea last night but it saved -18 bytes (i.e. increased size).


--
Nuns! Reverse!
From: io_x on 17 Oct 2009 02:16

"Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:op.u1vwrg1phswpfo(a)dell3100...
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:31:09 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote:
> I had another idea last night but it saved -18 bytes (i.e. increased size).

I had one idea too see the code and debug code
in hugi compo 11 (the maze solver) but all this
has allow me to gain only 2-4 bytes


From: Esra Sdrawkcab on 17 Oct 2009 03:46
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:16:15 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote:

>
> "Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:op.u1vwrg1phswpfo(a)dell3100...
>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:31:09 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote:
>> I had another idea last night but it saved -18 bytes (i.e. increased
>> size).
>
> I had one idea too see the code and debug code
> in hugi compo 11 (the maze solver) but all this
> has allow me to gain only 2-4 bytes
>
thanks. I'll take a look. can I email you privately with the ideas I had?
to save the hardcore competition players from worrying that I'm giving too
much away?

>


--
Nuns! Reverse!
From: io_x on 17 Oct 2009 13:10
"Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:op.u1xo65c7hswpfo(a)dell3100...
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:16:15 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio
>> news:op.u1vwrg1phswpfo(a)dell3100...
>>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:31:09 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote:
>>> I had another idea last night but it saved -18 bytes (i.e. increased size).
>>
>> I had one idea too see the code and debug code
>> in hugi compo 11 (the maze solver) but all this
>> has allow me to gain only 2-4 bytes
>>
> thanks. I'll take a look. can I email you privately with the ideas I had? to
> save the hardcore competition players from worrying that I'm giving too much
> away?

no; i not agree on what Sir Espineter says


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: FILE_FLAG_POSIX_SEMANTICS question
Next: x86-based VM: code/data sharing and security...