From: alex23 on 13 Jun 2010 21:43 a...(a)pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: > If a new-ish term is being introduced, > expecting each person to search for the meaning is rude. The question then becomes how does one determine whether a term one is using needs defining? Does OO? How about FP? Or TDD? Is there a metric for how many years or how many journals etc a concept needs to exist within before we just assume people know it? If something is ridiculously obvious to you, does that necessarily hold true for everyone else? Or is it just easier to assume that people within a specific domain have the means to fill in their gaps of understanding themselves?
From: Robert Kern on 13 Jun 2010 22:03 On 6/13/10 8:43 PM, alex23 wrote: > a...(a)pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: >> If a new-ish term is being introduced, >> expecting each person to search for the meaning is rude. > > The question then becomes how does one determine whether a term one is > using needs defining? When someone asks for the definition. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
From: Terry Reedy on 14 Jun 2010 01:28 On 6/13/2010 9:43 PM, alex23 wrote: > a...(a)pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: >> If a new-ish term is being introduced, >> expecting each person to search for the meaning is rude. > > The question then becomes how does one determine whether a term one is > using needs defining? If it has never be used before on Python list, then is definitely qualifies. Come on, BDD was very recently coined by someone writing a book which has a relatively small following. Maybe it should become bigger. Maybe not. Even the Wikipedia definition, which someone else quoted, does not mean much to me.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: assign class variable in __init__ Next: capitalize() NOT the same as var[0].upper _ var[1:] |