sample client server app
in [VB.NET]
|
From: Tom Shelton on 15 Jan 2010 01:53 On 2010-01-15, jerryys <jerryys(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > i dont believe i compare winsock in my statement. i do make an observation > about how microsoft decided to implement winsock facilities in .net. a true In fact, you did - you talked about how there wasn't a high level facility like the winsock control. But, ok. <snip> > assume you thought > winsock was great then. You know that old statement about assuming? I was burned by the notorious unreliablity of the winsock control and it's inabaility to handle serious loads... I moved to using my own class wrappers around the winsock api after the one and only time I used the winsock control. > in conclusion vb is a cute language for non > programmers to do basic home projects. programmers should stick to c++ or > lower level languages when developing for non main frame serious > applications. > What are you talking about? Are you some sort of language snob? I'm having a hard time telling what your meaning is. My personal and professional preference is not VB - but, I certainly don't think of it as a toy. -- Tom Shelton
From: jerryys on 16 Jan 2010 02:10
Tom, i appreciated your help with the links you provided at the start of this sequence of replies and answers. Keep up the good work. Maybe you can help me with a problem in the future. jerryys "Tom Shelton" wrote: > On 2010-01-15, jerryys <jerryys(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > i dont believe i compare winsock in my statement. i do make an observation > > about how microsoft decided to implement winsock facilities in .net. a true > > In fact, you did - you talked about how there wasn't a high level facility > like the winsock control. But, ok. > > <snip> > > > assume you thought > > winsock was great then. > > You know that old statement about assuming? I was burned by the notorious > unreliablity of the winsock control and it's inabaility to handle serious > loads... I moved to using my own class wrappers around the winsock api after > the one and only time I used the winsock control. > > > in conclusion vb is a cute language for non > > programmers to do basic home projects. programmers should stick to c++ or > > lower level languages when developing for non main frame serious > > applications. > > > > What are you talking about? Are you some sort of language snob? I'm having a > hard time telling what your meaning is. My personal and professional > preference is not VB - but, I certainly don't think of it as a toy. > > -- > Tom Shelton > . > |