From: wolfgang kern on

Jim Higgins wrote:


>>The way to solve this problem is for a small interested group (2/3) to
>>volunteer, and start a moderated group under a similar name, on Google
>>Groups.

>>Then most spam is detected and sidelined to a "please confirm" file,
>>where honest postings can be tagged by an informed moderator, for
>>immediate release; while the others are quickly junked and do not
>>appear in public.

>>Lack of postings and business will then deter this plague.

> Move to Google to avoid Google spam? Oh, HELL NO!

> Yes, this would work as you describe, but I'd rather be poked in the
> eye with a sharp stick than deal with the Google web interface.

> Also it just rubs me the wrong way to use Google to avoid a problem
> caused by Google spammers that Google does little about. Google
> allows the problem to continue, but offers refuge from it if you set
> up moderated groups on Google. Not NO, but HELL NO!

> What this sort of thing will do in the long run is "Balkanize" Usenet.
> And when the "Real Usenet" loses enough critical mass to places like
> Google, it dies.

> Far better (IMHO) that we simply filter everything with a MessageID
> containing "googlegroups.com" and the good folks posting from there
> come back to Usenet.

I'm full with you here, we should try what we can to keep UseNet alive.

__
wolfgang



From: Willow on
I"m trying to post now using a real usenet server... let's see if it works.

Willow

wolfgang kern wrote:
> Jim Higgins wrote:
[snip]
>> Far better (IMHO) that we simply filter everything with a MessageID
>> containing "googlegroups.com" and the good folks posting from there
>> come back to Usenet.
>
> I'm full with you here, we should try what we can to keep UseNet alive.
>
> __
> wolfgang
>
>
>