From: Denis McMahon on
Ok, I'm having some sort of mental block here.

Can I run spamassassin as a transparent proxy on my pop3 grabs with
thunderbird, or would I need to grab mail with eg fetchmail, pipe it
through spam assassin and then deliver it to thunderbird using a
localhost pop3 or smtp method?

I see that thunderbird can pick up the local mailspool, and use the
designated isp smtp smarthost for outgoing, but I'm not 100% sure how it
would all hook together.

Rgds

Denis McMahon
From: Martin Gregorie on
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:06:33 +0000, Denis McMahon wrote:

> Can I run spamassassin as a transparent proxy on my pop3 grabs with
> thunderbird, or would I need to grab mail with eg fetchmail, pipe it
> through spam assassin and then deliver it to thunderbird using a
> localhost pop3 or smtp method?
>
I think the latter, since you can only use a pipe to pass mail to SA: it
doesn't understand POP3/IMAP or SMTP protocols.

IME you should use getmail rather than fetchmail - if the latter has its
session closed by the ISP's mail server it leaves the mail sitting in the
ISP's mailbox forever and marked as 'seen'. You don't get dups but
equally you do have to periodically go in and clear it out.

To give you some idea of how to put the rig together, heres how my setup
works. I'm doing pretty much what you want, but with a private MTA in the
loop. I can't get my head round configuring sendmail (and the O'Reilly
book is incomplete junk) so I use Postfix instead. Here's the setup:

ISP--POP3-->getmail | spamc | spamkiller | sendmail ----+
^ |
| +------SMTP-----------------+
| V
+------SMTP------------ Postfix--- Local mailbox
^ | |
| | v
| Thunderbird Dovecot
| | |
| | POP3
| | |
| V v
+--SMTP- -+<----Evolution

I use Evolution, but not on the same host as Postfix, which is why I need
to run Dovedot. As the diagram shows if you're running Thunderbird on the
same host as your MTA it should simply read from the local mailboxes your
MTA delivers mail to. In either case, you send outbound mail to the MTA
for either local delivery to another user or for external delivery via
your ISP's smarthost.

getmail uses a script as its local delivery agent. My script contains the
pipeline:

spamc | spamkiller | sendmail

to process incoming mail and deliver it to Postfix:

- spamc is part of SA: it delivers messages to the spamd daemon, accepts
the marked-up message and passes that on. Running spamc/spamd is much
faster than simply using spamassassin because there's no per-message
start/stop overhead.

- spamkiller is my own code. It silently drops mail that SA has marked
as spam

- sendmail is a Postfix utility that receives mail on stdin and delivers
it to Postfix via SMTP. Its called sendmail to avoid breaking other
programs: all UNIX programs that can send mail call sendmail to do so.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
From: Denis McMahon on
Martin Gregorie wrote:

> To give you some idea of how to put the rig together, heres how my setup
> works.

Thanks, at least I think I know what I need to do now. I believe I can
use the following chain:

Demon / Googlemail mailboxes
---> POP3 --->
getmail | spamc | sendmail
---> SMTP localhost --->
Postfix -> Local mailbox -> Thunderbird
---> SMTP --->
ISP outgoing smarthost

Does that make sense to you? Presumably I use the "unix movemail" server
type.

The thunderbird -> isp smarthost for outgoing mail already works, and
saves me setting up postfix to do that bit.

Off to read getmail and postfix instructions I guess.

Rgds

Denis McMahon
From: Martin Gregorie on
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:57:30 +0000, Denis McMahon wrote:

> Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
>> To give you some idea of how to put the rig together, heres how my
>> setup works.
>
> Thanks, at least I think I know what I need to do now. I believe I can
> use the following chain:
>
> Demon / Googlemail mailboxes
> ---> POP3 --->
> getmail | spamc | sendmail
> ---> SMTP localhost --->
> Postfix -> Local mailbox -> Thunderbird
> ---> SMTP --->
> ISP outgoing smarthost
>
> Does that make sense to you? Presumably I use the "unix movemail" server
> type.
>
Yes, that should work, though I'd still run the outbound through Postfix
for tidiness. Its only one directive in main.cf - here's mine:

relayhost = smtp.ukfsn.org


> Off to read getmail and postfix instructions I guess.
>
Getmail is pretty straight forward to set up - you'd just configure a
receiver for each mail source.

The main documentation for getmail and Postfix is on their web sites.

Read up on postconf too - its a most useful debugging tool if the config
doesn't do quite what you wanted.

Just in case you don't know about it, be sure to read up on the
'alternatives' command too. Its used by most Linuxes to switch between
the various MTAs and any other major system components which have a
number of widely accepted alternative implementations.

Follow this order:
- Install and configure Postfix
- Set the run levels that you want for Postfix (2-5).
- Set the runlevels for sendmail (none).
- Stop sendmail
- Use alternatives to make Postfix the default MTA.
- Start Postfix

In Fedora daemons are started and stopped with the 'service' command and
'chkconfig' is used to adjust the runlevels at which daemons are active.
These levels control what happens during boot and shutdown. Other distros
may use different but equivalent tools for these jobs.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
From: Martin Gregorie on
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:25:57 +0000, Ivor Jones wrote:

> On 06/12/09 12:27, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:06:33 +0000, Denis McMahon wrote:
>>
>>> Can I run spamassassin as a transparent proxy on my pop3 grabs with
>>> thunderbird, or would I need to grab mail with eg fetchmail, pipe it
>>> through spam assassin and then deliver it to thunderbird using a
>>> localhost pop3 or smtp method?
>>>
>> I think the latter, since you can only use a pipe to pass mail to SA:
>> it doesn't understand POP3/IMAP or SMTP protocols.
>>
>> IME you should use getmail rather than fetchmail - if the latter has
>> its session closed by the ISP's mail server it leaves the mail sitting
>> in the ISP's mailbox forever and marked as 'seen'. You don't get dups
>> but equally you do have to periodically go in and clear it out.
>
> Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. I filter all my mail via Google for
> two reasons; firstly the spam filtering is very good and secondly it
> *does* keep stuff forever. More than once I've deleted something by
> mistake. A friend recently lost mail she wanted to keep from her
> "Deleted" folder - I tried in vain to tell her that putting stuff you
> *don't* actually want to delete there wasn't a particularly good idea.
>
I run my own PostgreSQL-based mail archive, automatically fed from
Postfix via the magic of the 'always_bcc' directive. Its benefits are:
- spam isn't archived
- effectively unlimited archival storage
- fast searching and retrieving by any combination of address, subject,
date range and body text.

I'm planning to make it available shortly: details can be found at
www.libelle-systems.com


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |