7D full review at dpreview
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Ray Fischer on 21 Nov 2009 15:20 David J Taylor <david-taylor(a)blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >> David J Taylor >>>Bob, Ray claimed that by adding a swivel LCD finder to a Canon 7D "it >>>would cost a >>>lot more and make the camera much bigger and less durable", whereas I >>>presented some evidence that this did not appear to apply to roughly >>>comparable Nikon cameras, which are neither significantly bigger, nor do >>>they cost more in the swivel finder version. >> >> Don't start lying. > >Sorry, Ray, but you're not going to wind me up again by false accusations. You're going to stick with your own revisionism? >Anyone who wants to can read the past posts and form their own >conclusions. I showed, using your own examples, that the camera with the flip-out screen was indeed larger and more expensive. And just above you claim that's not the case, which makes you a liar. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: David J Taylor on 21 Nov 2009 15:43 "Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message news:4b084b90$0$1622$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... > David J Taylor > <david-taylor(a)blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >>> David J Taylor > >>>>Bob, Ray claimed that by adding a swivel LCD finder to a Canon 7D "it >>>>would cost a >>>>lot more and make the camera much bigger and less durable", whereas I >>>>presented some evidence that this did not appear to apply to roughly >>>>comparable Nikon cameras, which are neither significantly bigger, nor >>>>do >>>>they cost more in the swivel finder version. >>> >>> Don't start lying. >> >>Sorry, Ray, but you're not going to wind me up again by false >>accusations. > > You're going to stick with your own revisionism? > >>Anyone who wants to can read the past posts and form their own >>conclusions. > > I showed, using your own examples, that the camera with the flip-out > screen was indeed larger and more expensive. And just above you claim > that's not the case, which makes you a liar. > > -- > Ray Fischer > rfischer(a)sonic.net No I told the truth, that the camera was not "much bigger" nor did it cost "a lot more". Anyone can see that from the record of the discussion. 5mm thicker is not "much bigger", and $799 is not the "near doubling of price", and not "a lot more", than $699 which you claimed. But this is on the record already. Whilst I am quite happy to engage in reasoned argument, I regard persistently being called a liar and an idiot as impolite at best, and close to harassment. David
From: David J Taylor on 21 Nov 2009 15:51 "Robert Coe" <bob(a)1776.COM> wrote in message news:6vrfg55tl26el6rusjt64krsgpn7qvs7f3(a)4ax.com... [] > We don't consider 799 US dollars to be anywhere near double 699 US > dollars. > Does one apply different rules of arithmetic to euros? > > Bob Bob, thanks for your contribution. As you surmise, relative number of Euros behave in the same way as relative numbers of US dollars! I have added rfischer(a)sonic.net to my kill-file, although whether that will have any effect on his impoliteness to one and all and unreasoned discussion I somewhat doubt. Cheers, David
From: Ray Fischer on 21 Nov 2009 17:30
David J Taylor <david-taylor(a)blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote: > >"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >news:4b084b90$0$1622$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... >> David J Taylor >> <david-taylor(a)blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >>>> David J Taylor >> >>>>>Bob, Ray claimed that by adding a swivel LCD finder to a Canon 7D "it >>>>>would cost a >>>>>lot more and make the camera much bigger and less durable", whereas I >>>>>presented some evidence that this did not appear to apply to roughly >>>>>comparable Nikon cameras, which are neither significantly bigger, nor >>>>>do >>>>>they cost more in the swivel finder version. >>>> >>>> Don't start lying. >>> >>>Sorry, Ray, but you're not going to wind me up again by false >>>accusations. >> >> You're going to stick with your own revisionism? >> >>>Anyone who wants to can read the past posts and form their own >>>conclusions. >> >> I showed, using your own examples, that the camera with the flip-out >> screen was indeed larger and more expensive. And just above you claim >> that's not the case, which makes you a liar. > >No I told the truth, that the camera was not "much bigger" nor did it cost >"a lot more". And yet it's still bigger, significantly more expensive, and less durable. > Anyone can see that from the record of the discussion. 5mm >thicker is not "much bigger", and $799 is not the "near doubling of >price", and not "a lot more", than $699 which you claimed. Now you're lying outright. I made no such claim. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |