From: Don Burn on 27 Sep 2010 16:08 Since most news groups have gone already, any idea what forum is replacing this news group? Hopefully it is a separate forum, and not one of these lets dump it in with some other subject like they have done with so many of the groups. Of course most of the traffic is now on NTDEV at http://www.osronline.com anyway, but just wondering where this group will end up. Don Burn (MVP, Windows DKD) Windows Filesystem and Driver Consulting Website: http://www.windrvr.com Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr
From: 440gtx on 27 Sep 2010 23:44 > any idea what forum is replacing this news group? The consensus is to move to an open, non-microsoft moderated forum and so when the time comes we all can continue as usual at the below group. http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.nt.kernel-mode OSR by the way has its advantages, but is a sub-optimal replacement in the sense that many topics are considered controversial and thus banned there. Staying with google groups allows people to discuss whatever they want and those that aren't interested in a topic can simply skip over it or go somewhere else. So business as usual.
From: Don Burn on 28 Sep 2010 07:25 Sorry, Google groups is not the replacement. That is an older group that has its own set of problems. I was asking what forum Microsoft intended to replace this with. Don Burn (MVP, Windows DKD) Windows Filesystem and Driver Consulting Website: http://www.windrvr.com Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr "440gtx(a)email.com" <440gtx(a)email.com> wrote in message news:4a56f8d1-e0c4-49e8-aa4e-4a706d65dfd4(a)q28g2000prb.googlegroups.com: > > any idea what forum is replacing this news group? > > The consensus is to move to an open, non-microsoft moderated forum and > so when the time comes we all can continue as usual at the below > group. > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.nt.kernel-mode > > OSR by the way has its advantages, but is a sub-optimal replacement in > the sense that many topics are considered controversial and thus > banned there. Staying with google groups allows people to discuss > whatever they want and those that aren't interested in a topic can > simply skip over it or go somewhere else. So business as usual.
From: PavelA on 28 Sep 2010 10:44 On 28-Sep-2010 13:25, Don Burn wrote: > Sorry, Google groups is not the replacement. That is an older group > that has its own set of problems. I was asking what forum Microsoft > intended to replace this with. > It seems that they are suffering now thru more "disruptive" issues than this little NG... http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/09/why_microsoft_surrendered_spaces.html http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/27/windows-live-blogging/ Maybe we need to find the maintainers of WHDC (http://www.microsoft.com/whdc) and ask them to settle this question with the Forums admin. -- pa
From: Ali on 29 Sep 2010 12:29 On Sep 28, 10:44 pm, PavelA <pave...(a)12fastmail34.fm> wrote: > On 28-Sep-2010 13:25, Don Burn wrote: > > > Sorry, Google groups is not the replacement. That is an older group > > that has its own set of problems. I was asking what forum Microsoft > > intended to replace this with. > > It seems that they are suffering now thru more "disruptive" issues than > this little NG... > > http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/09/why_microsoft_surrendered_sp... > > http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/27/windows-live-blogging/ > > Maybe we need to find the maintainers of WHDC > (http://www.microsoft.com/whdc) and ask them to settle this question > with the Forums admin. > > -- pa Folks! Can we just be in typical usenet space? Don't think google thing gonna work, they are just trying too many things. You don't want to endup like _wave_ or _buzz_ . OSR is fine but bit confined though. Lets stick to the old idea of Tim. B. L. and make it open and accessible. (Its good to be back) ali
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: BSOD when play/capture sound thru USB audio device on Windows 2000 Next: WDDM driver problem |