From: m on
Fortunately many of us live in countries where this inanity is irrelevant
because software cannot be patent; even if these were legitimate patents!

"Hector Santos" <sant9442(a)nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ebhZMdmuKHA.5940(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Apple finally did it! They all Client/Server technology, RPC, DCOM
> network resource file sharing, offline, offload (caching) technology,
> object oriented technology, name it everything under the roof because
> Android and Microsoft WP7 is going to be a threat to them.
>
> Here is a break down of the old patents (and I mean OLD) that Apple is now
> enforcing:
>
> http://i.engadget.com/2010/03/02/apple-vs-htc-a-patent-breakdown/
>
> What interest me is this one:
>
> Patent #5,481,721: Method for providing automatic and dynamic translation
> of object oriented programming language-based message passing into
> operation system message passing using proxy objects
>
> This one's fun -- it's actually an old NeXT patent from 1996. And we're
> talking old-school NeXT -- the inventors are listed as Betrand Serlet,
> Avie Tevanian, and Lee Boynton. Anyway, this one is large, broad, and
> technical: it covers passing objects in an OS between processes by way of
> a proxy object. Again, given that this is primarily an OS patent and that
> Apple claims all of HTC's Android phones infringe it, it's hard to shake
> the impression that this case is anything but a proxy for a larger fight
> to come.
>
> That means our 1996 Wildcat! Interactive Net Server
> (http://www.santronics.com) and Microsoft ASP.NET violating technology!
>
> Wow!
>
>
> --
> HLS

From: Tim Roberts on
Hector Santos <sant9442(a)nospam.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Apple finally did it! They all Client/Server technology, RPC, DCOM
>network resource file sharing, offline, offload (caching) technology,
>object oriented technology, name it everything under the roof because
>Android and Microsoft WP7 is going to be a threat to them.
>
>Here is a break down of the old patents (and I mean OLD) that Apple is
>now enforcing:
> http://i.engadget.com/2010/03/02/apple-vs-htc-a-patent-breakdown/
>....Again, given that this is
>primarily an OS patent and that Apple claims all of HTC's Android
>phones infringe it, it's hard to shake the impression that this case
>is anything but a proxy for a larger fight to come.

Not at all. I think you're confused about the purpose of these lawsuits.
They don't want to stop all computing. They just want to hinder the sales
of phones that compete with the iPhone.
--
Tim Roberts, timr(a)probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.