From: Greg Russell on 15 Mar 2010 23:58
mm <NOPSAMmm2005(a)bigfoot.com> typed:
> He didn't mention anything. He used "guys" ...
That might be the crux of his problems. Have you read the about the issues
with the Catholic Pope and his brother, as well as the Irsish cardinal? They
all used guys too, or at least covered-up their actions for them, using
From: Anthony Buckland on 17 Mar 2010 12:36
"Greg Russell" <grussell(a)invalid.com> wrote in message
> In news:%23NFbGoHxKHA.1548(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl,
> Donald Anadell <danadell(a)nospamersmikrotec.com> typed:
>> Perhaps the OP is using the term "Guys" in a Gender Neutral way.
> You sound like you're from San Francisco ... not that there's anything
> *wrong* with that ...
I know various straight Vancouver women who address each
other or a mixed group as "guys".
From: Greg Russell on 17 Mar 2010 12:54
Anthony Buckland <anthonybucklandnospam(a)telus.net> typed:
> I know various straight Vancouver women who address each
> other or a mixed group as "guys".
It's probably the only thing you have going for you.