From: Tony Toews [MVP] on
"david" <david(a)nospam.au> wrote:

>This uses up autonumbers, and bloats the database to the extent of any
>records which are rejected.

And given how Jet 4.0 appears to work this might be one 4k page per
record that was in the append query before records were rejected.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Tony's Main MS Access pages - http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
For a convenient utility to keep your users FEs and other files
updated see http://www.autofeupdater.com/
Granite Fleet Manager http://www.granitefleet.com/
From: david on
> And given how Jet 4.0 appears to work this might be one 4k page per
> record that was in the append query before records were rejected.

I think I remember that there was a specific fix/update to prevent that
happening.

(david)


"Tony Toews [MVP]" <ttoews(a)telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:hv7lr59n4m7mivkc8mo31ins6lr7l4f4n1(a)4ax.com...
> "david" <david(a)nospam.au> wrote:
>
>>This uses up autonumbers, and bloats the database to the extent of any
>>records which are rejected.
>
> And given how Jet 4.0 appears to work this might be one 4k page per
> record that was in the append query before records were rejected.
>
> Tony
> --
> Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
> Tony's Main MS Access pages - http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
> Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
> For a convenient utility to keep your users FEs and other files
> updated see http://www.autofeupdater.com/
> Granite Fleet Manager http://www.granitefleet.com/