Prev: Errors in Windows 7
Next: using Outlook and sending CC address's
From: Carlos Rocha on 26 May 2010 18:00
I use Spread COM for years and it's very fast and stable. Spread for
Windows Forms seems even better

http://www.fpoint.com/netproducts/spreadwin/spreadwin.aspx

--
Carlos Rocha
From: Geoff Schaller on 26 May 2010 19:05
John,

If you want a fully featured and professional product then I think you
have to go Infragistics. However it is as dear as Visual Studio again.
Their gird control is bBrowser times 10 BUT you can in fact get almost
all you want from the regular browser. VS 2008's grid does 90% of the
things we want - Infragistics the rest. VS 2010 may have further
improvements.

Geoff



"John Gosub" <servia(a)tstt.net.tt> wrote in message
news:a944f089-dd02-40e5-acbb-d6b00c4ca50e(a)y12g2000vbr.googlegroups.com:

> Hello to All, Can someone recommend a good C# dot net grid like
> bBrowser but has much more features than bBrowser. I will like to use
> some good C# tools with vulcan.
>
> Thanks!!
> John Gosub

From: Mathias on 27 May 2010 02:58
On 26 Maj, 20:28, "Stephen Quinn" <stevej...(a)bigpondSPAM.net.au>
wrote:
> John
>
> Take a look at the Developer Express Components.
>    http://www.devexpress.com
>
> CYA
> Steve

Thats the ones I use as well. My colleagues who been using
infragistics says that the devexpress grid is faster.

/Mathias
From: Geoff Schaller on 27 May 2010 03:49
Mathias,

I don't know about speed (the grid seems to be as fast as anything else)
but the Infragistics tools do need a lot of support dlls - so it is
quite heavy in the hands of users.

One problem is that once you go down a 3rd party path, you get locked in

So be careful of your choice.

Go on to the comparison forums but also be aware that the doom sayers
outnumber happy folk 5:1, simply because most happy folk don't bother
saying so.

Geoff



"Mathias" <mathias.hakansson(a)consultec.se> wrote in message
news:761abda3-b9f9-4043-a95d-38d336f036ac(a)r9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com:

> On 26 Maj, 20:28, "Stephen Quinn" <stevej...(a)bigpondSPAM.net.au>
> wrote:
>
> > John
> >
> > Take a look at the Developer Express Components.
> > http://www.devexpress.com
> >
> > CYA
> > Steve
>
>
> Thats the ones I use as well. My colleagues who been using
> infragistics says that the devexpress grid is faster.
>
> /Mathias

From: Mathias on 27 May 2010 04:36
Geoff,

the speed issue may be ralated to the Infragistics ASP component.

/Mathias


On 27 Maj, 09:49, "Geoff Schaller" <geo...(a)softxwareobjectives.com.au>
wrote:
> Mathias,
>
> I don't know about speed (the grid seems to be as fast as anything else)
> but the Infragistics tools do need a lot of support dlls - so it is
> quite heavy in the hands of users.
>
> One problem is that once you go down a 3rd party path, you get locked in
>
> So be careful of your choice.
>
> Go on to the comparison forums but also be aware that the doom sayers
> outnumber happy folk 5:1, simply because most happy folk don't bother
> saying so.
>
> Geoff
>
> "Mathias" <mathias.hakans...(a)consultec.se> wrote in message
>
> news:761abda3-b9f9-4043-a95d-38d336f036ac(a)r9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
> > On 26 Maj, 20:28, "Stephen Quinn" <stevej...(a)bigpondSPAM.net.au>
> > wrote:
>
> > > John
>
> > > Take a look at the Developer Express Components.
> > >    http://www.devexpress.com
>
> > > CYA
> > > Steve
>
> > Thats the ones I use as well. My colleagues who been using
> > infragistics says that the devexpress grid is faster.
>
> > /Mathias

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Errors in Windows 7
Next: using Outlook and sending CC address's