Prev: hiding recipient 's email address without using cc or bb
Next: Faxing over the network
From: Tom Willett on 6 May 2010 08:52
LOL. You still don't get it, hooplehead.
Good luck.

"Puddin' Man" <puddingDOTman(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hu94u5h59l7cckctmsago3sfmhh86286gu(a)4ax.com...
: On Wed, 5 May 2010 14:25:23 -0500, "Tom Willett"
<tom(a)youreadaisyifyoudo.com> wrote:
:
: >Sigh. As has been pointed out numerious times, things can change in a
: >hearbeat and the AVG can begin to cause problems. Especially since the AV
: >updates itself continuously.
:
: Sigh. Updates definitions. Changes in what it scans for, perhaps. I
: wouldn't expect it to change how it logs on to the server, retrieves
: messages.
:
: >There's only one way to find out. Uninstall AVG (you're using an outdated
: >version, BTW. It's at 9, now). Reboot, and custom reinstall WITHOUT the
: >email module.
:
: I downloaded v9 weeks ago, was waiting to see what problems others
: might have.
:
: >You're already protected with the resident scanner. The email scanning is
: >marketing hype.
:
: AVG 9 is installed, w/o Email scan. Same message retrieve error persists.
: No difference.
:
: P
:
:
: "Law Without Equity Is No Law At All. It Is A Form Of Jungle Rule."
:


From: Puddin' Man on 6 May 2010 20:16
On Thu, 6 May 2010 07:57:57 -0400, "Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]" <tillman1952(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

>> I make the -ERR [SYS/TEMP] as a server error. Do you concur?
>
>I do. The "[rx]" designation is for the messages that are coming in from the
>server. If this were happening to me, I'd log into the SBC Yahoo mailbox via
>a web browse and move the first message in the Inbox to another folder (create
>one if you don't have one handy), then try Outlook again to see if the problem
>is the message in the Inbox.

I put a couple of first-que'd messages in a "test" folder. I get the same error.
Made no difference.

>While you're there, you might want to check the
>"spam" folder for accumulated messages.

I've been monitoring it. Normally I get 4-8 spam msgs per day. Since the
problem began, the spam folder shows nothing new. The most recent spam
date is Wed, 4/28/10. I figger something like 20-60 spam msgs failed
to make it to the spam folder.

Can you make anything of that? I'm pert near clueless.

Thx,
P

"Law Without Equity Is No Law At All. It Is A Form Of Jungle Rule."

From: Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] on 7 May 2010 07:45
"Puddin' Man" <puddingDOTman(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0gm6u5pf24jmon5a41qafpgcf2pmqgjs9o(a)4ax.com...

> I put a couple of first-que'd messages in a "test" folder. I get the same
> error.
> Made no difference.

What I would do in this case is to move everything out of the server-side
Inbox and see if Outlook can complete a send/receive. If not, I'd try a new
mail profile. You say you're using Outlook 2000. If it's in Internet Mail
Only mode, that's a problem because it's not easy to create a new mail
profile. You have to mess with the registry. I always found it easier to
convert to Corporate/Workgroup mode because then the Mail applet in Control
Panel would allow me to create a new profile without using regedit..
Help>About will tell you wich you're using.

> I've been monitoring it. Normally I get 4-8 spam msgs per day. Since the
> problem began, the spam folder shows nothing new. The most recent spam
> date is Wed, 4/28/10. I figger something like 20-60 spam msgs failed
> to make it to the spam folder.

I just mentioned it because POP doesn't ever check that folder and if you use
a mail client, there's little reason to ever log into the server via web.
Server-side spam folders can get very full.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

From: Puddin' Man on 10 May 2010 18:38
I finally got a competent ATT support-critter to elevate the problem
to Yahoo server support (yes, it actually exists) where a corrupted
mailbox was "fixed".

Much thanks for help with this.

P

On Fri, 7 May 2010 07:45:09 -0400, "Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]" <tillman1952(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

>> I put a couple of first-que'd messages in a "test" folder. I get the same
>> error.
>> Made no difference.
>
>What I would do in this case is to move everything out of the server-side
>Inbox and see if Outlook can complete a send/receive. If not, I'd try a new
>mail profile. You say you're using Outlook 2000. If it's in Internet Mail
>Only mode, that's a problem because it's not easy to create a new mail
>profile. You have to mess with the registry. I always found it easier to
>convert to Corporate/Workgroup mode because then the Mail applet in Control
>Panel would allow me to create a new profile without using regedit..
>Help>About will tell you wich you're using.

"Law Without Equity Is No Law At All. It Is A Form Of Jungle Rule."

From: Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] on 11 May 2010 08:13
"Puddin' Man" <puddingDOTman(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ti2hu5lhe5t8anio6f9ip032v20kpcp748(a)4ax.com...

>I finally got a competent ATT support-critter to elevate the problem
> to Yahoo server support (yes, it actually exists) where a corrupted
> mailbox was "fixed".
>
> Much thanks for help with this.

You're welcome. I glad you were able to find the problem.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: hiding recipient 's email address without using cc or bb
Next: Faxing over the network