From: Sean Conolly on
"Bob Howes" <no.emailatnowhere.com> wrote in message
news:4be40ed9$0$6278$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Phildo" <Phil(a)phildo.net> wrote in message
> news:hrv5g5$2sc$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> My Audix D6 seems to have developed a fault after just a few months. Is
>> now very noisy and 14db quieter than the D112 they also had in the
>> studio. I suspect it has gone unbalanced but am sending it back to Audix
>> to get them to fix it.
>>
>> A friend of mine said he has had several engineer had the same thing
>> happen to them and suspect they must have made a bad batch.
>>
>> Anyone else heard or experienced similar?
>>
>> Phildo
>>
>
> Mine's been fine but I know of a guy who's gone through two of them--he
> believes that the trouble is indeed over-excursion, caused when he tended
> to place the head of the mic right in the "blast" coming from the hole on
> a very loud drummer, lending a bit of credence to PA's theory.

Personally, I don't think you ever need to put the mic right in the hole.
Most of what you get is a low frequency blast that has to be compressed and
tamed anyway, it's better to pu the mic where it sounds best and needs the
least processing.

For live sound I usually keep the mic well inside the drum, as Audix
recommends, or at worst place it with the diaphragm two~three inches inside
the port. For recording I like it outside of the drum by a few inches.

Sean


From: geoff on
Denny Strauser wrote:

>
> If this is the case, a foam windscreen might avoid a repeat of the
> damage. -Denny

Or putting it somewhere more sensible...

geoff


From: Bob Howes on

"Sean Conolly" <sjconolly_98(a)yaaho.com> wrote in message
news:hs1k7l$hqn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> "Bob Howes" <no.emailatnowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:4be40ed9$0$6278$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "Phildo" <Phil(a)phildo.net> wrote in message
>> news:hrv5g5$2sc$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>> My Audix D6 seems to have developed a fault after just a few months. Is
>>> now very noisy and 14db quieter than the D112 they also had in the
>>> studio. I suspect it has gone unbalanced but am sending it back to Audix
>>> to get them to fix it.
>>>
>>> A friend of mine said he has had several engineer had the same thing
>>> happen to them and suspect they must have made a bad batch.
>>>
>>> Anyone else heard or experienced similar?
>>>
>>> Phildo
>>>
>>
>> Mine's been fine but I know of a guy who's gone through two of them--he
>> believes that the trouble is indeed over-excursion, caused when he tended
>> to place the head of the mic right in the "blast" coming from the hole on
>> a very loud drummer, lending a bit of credence to PA's theory.
>
> Personally, I don't think you ever need to put the mic right in the hole.
> Most of what you get is a low frequency blast that has to be compressed
> and tamed anyway, it's better to pu the mic where it sounds best and needs
> the least processing.
>
> For live sound I usually keep the mic well inside the drum, as Audix
> recommends, or at worst place it with the diaphragm two~three inches
> inside the port. For recording I like it outside of the drum by a few
> inches.
>
> Sean
>
>

Agreed. My suggestion to him was to move the mic inside the drum, pointed
at the beater to get some "click" as well as the "boom". I believe he's
tried the new position and likes the sound better but he's been on the road
so I haven't actually seen the guy lately.

Bob