From: unruh on
On 2010-06-14, chris <ithinkiam(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/06/10 21:23, Paul Martin wrote:
>> In article<husq6b$hh6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
>> chris wrote:
>>> On 11/06/10 01:28, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>>>> On 2010-06-11, unruh wrote:
>>>>> Well, not closed. Now we get appeals and more appeals.
>>>>
>>>> That *was* the appeal!
>>
>>> Ah, but there's always the appeal against the appeal...
>>
>>> This will only stop when SCO finally run out of money
>>
>> Not even then. IBM still has its counterclaims, and can pursue those
>> against the remains, perhaps opening up who funded SCO's berserker
>> actions.
>
> Ooh, maybe we'll find if MS have really been funding SCO as has been
> rumoured...?

You mean if MS guarenteed any legal losses that SCO suffered? Ie, IBM's
suit was really into the pockets of MS? Somehow I doubt that MS would
have been that stupid. laundered money up front I can see.