From: jacko on
Hi

Sub harmonics? umm. integrate your signal, comparator slice it with
the LPF DCish of your signal, feed back some of this square wave after
dividing by two via a schmitt trigger FF into your signal. Low pass
filter this and add some to your original signal to make the sub
harmonic enhanced version.

Cheers Jacko

p.s. don't forget the sub base W bins. ;-)
From: jacko on
On 17 Mar, 15:57, jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sub harmonics? umm. integrate your signal, comparator slice it with
> the LPF DCish of your signal, feed back some of this square wave after
> dividing by two via a schmitt trigger FF into your signal. Low pass
> filter this and add some to your original signal to make the sub
> harmonic enhanced version.
>
> Cheers Jacko
>
> p.s. don't forget the sub base W bins. ;-)

don't forget a delay line feedback for that ooooooooooooooh.
From: Tim Wescott on
jacko wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sub harmonics? umm. integrate your signal, comparator slice it with
> the LPF DCish of your signal, feed back some of this square wave after
> dividing by two via a schmitt trigger FF into your signal. Low pass
> filter this and add some to your original signal to make the sub
> harmonic enhanced version.
>
> Cheers Jacko
>
> p.s. don't forget the sub base W bins. ;-)

This works well with signals that have a strong fundamental, like
guitar. In fact, there's a guitar effect that does just this. For
signals that lack the fundamental (bells), or where the fundamental is
of lower strength than the harmonics (can't think off the top of my head
-- don't brass instruments do this?) it won't work.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com
From: jungledmnc on
>Hi
>
>Sub harmonics? umm. integrate your signal, comparator slice it with
>the LPF DCish of your signal, feed back some of this square wave after
>dividing by two via a schmitt trigger FF into your signal. Low pass
>filter this and add some to your original signal to make the sub
>harmonic enhanced version.
>
>Cheers Jacko
>
>p.s. don't forget the sub base W bins. ;-)
>

Uuuuuu :)) what? :)) Could you write it in twice as number of words? I'm
trying to decode it, but I'm kinda stuck :)).
From: Jerry Avins on
jungledmnc wrote:
> Thank you all people! And Nils actually that's what I'm talking about -
> audio stuff, so thanks a lot for valuable info!
>
> Anyway folks can you point me out to some zero-latency method? I mean there
> was a Hilbert transformer idea, I never did it, but assume it is
> similar/generalized fourier transform, so it would be processed block by
> block, therefore induce latency. Similar with pitch-shifting, I guess it
> could be done using granular-pitch shifting, but the results are usually
> quite ugly.

Every process introduces latency od some amount. If you can cite one
that seems to you to have none, you will have described a tolerable amount.

Jerry
--
Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen, and thinking what
nobody has thought. .. Albert Szent-Gyorgi
�����������������������������������������������������������������������