From: Nobody on
"Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage(a)swspectrum.com> wrote in message
news:mj3mm5du1ta28gifmoeag6bk0s9kjaj99u(a)4ax.com...
>
> http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vbgeneral/thread/6a0d7875-7b43-4bb5-969a-72871be7646b
>

So the OP multiposted? That explains why he didn't respond to this thread.
<Sigh>


From: mayayana on
>
> Officially...
>
> Classic VB Corner -- Visual Studio Magazine
> http://visualstudiomagazine.com/Articles/List/Classic-VB-Corner.aspx
>
> But I try to make get them here, as soon as I learn they're public
> (they really don't tell me, either!), as well...
>
> http://vb.mvps.org/articles/

Thanks. I've seen some of those when you've
mentioned them, but then lose track of the site,
since everything else there is .Net.




From: Paul Clement on
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:21:08 -0500, "C. Kevin Provance" <*@*.*> wrote:

� | On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:41:06 -0800, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org>
� wrote:
� | Oh, I definitely think the audience would be bigger if you were actually
� writing about Visual Basic
� | .NET, especially when you consider that the participation in those
� newsgroups and forums is far
� | greater than the Classic VB newsgroups. Most .NET newbies start working
� with Visual Basic Express
� | Edition before they even consider looking at Visual C# Express Edition.
� |
� | Even if it was simply the cool things you can do with Classic VB and
� VB.NET interop I'm sure there
� | would be interest there.

� How very clever. Attempt to coerce one of Classic VB's biggest supports
� into something .Nxt related under the guise of Classic VB. Getting him to
� do so gives you and the other evangelists an in road to post your .Nxt
� drivel here behind any Interop article you might get Karl to write.

� You have no shame. None.


Well based upon your rather undignified responses to others seeking information in this venue you're
most intimately familiar with acts of shame.

Your repeated denial of alternatives and options or even the discussion thereof is definitive proof
of that. ;-)


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Paul Clement on
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:44:40 -0800, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote:

� Paul Clement wrote:
� > Oh, I definitely think

� A fact not necessarily in evidence. ;-)

Would it matter if it was? ;-)

� > Even if it was simply the cool things you can do with Classic VB and VFred
� > interop I'm sure there would be interest there.

� Heh, no...

I didn't think so. ;-)


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Karl E. Peterson on
mayayana wrote:
>>
>> Officially...
>>
>> Classic VB Corner -- Visual Studio Magazine
>> http://visualstudiomagazine.com/Articles/List/Classic-VB-Corner.aspx
>>
>> But I try to make get them here, as soon as I learn they're public
>> (they really don't tell me, either!), as well...
>>
>> http://vb.mvps.org/articles/
>
> Thanks. I've seen some of those when you've
> mentioned them, but then lose track of the site,
> since everything else there is .Net.

There's a newsletter you can sign up for, but it (too) is about 90%
irrelevent. That's usually how I find out it's out there, though. :-(

--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org