How to code batch file?
in [Windows XP]
|
From: Twayne on 22 Apr 2010 11:58 In news:eP0pHsh4KHA.6132(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, Bob I <birelan(a)yahoo.com> typed: > HeyBub wrote: > >> Eric wrote: >> >>> I need to consistently download patch on following web >>> site, but the file name keeps changing based on date, for >>> example >>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/20100421-002-x86.exe >>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/yyymmdd-002-x86.exe Does anyone >>> have any suggestions on how to code a batch >>> file to download the patch based on specific date format? >>> so I can set schedule task to run it. Does anyone have >>> any suggestions? Thanks in advance for any suggestions >>> Eric >> >> >> Even if you ARE successful, you're asking for trouble. >> Yesterday McAfee finally caught up to Symantec in the race >> to slow down computers. > > Slow, or KILL? No slowdown at all here, reasonably small footprint, excellent speed. Actually I noticed NO difference when NIS 2009 and now 2010 were installed. I think you guys are behind the times. McAfee I don't know about; haven't used them in years.
From: Sardine on 22 Apr 2010 14:27 Twayne wrote: > In news:eP0pHsh4KHA.6132(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, > Bob I <birelan(a)yahoo.com> typed: >> HeyBub wrote: >> >>> Eric wrote: >>> >>>> I need to consistently download patch on following web >>>> site, but the file name keeps changing based on date, for >>>> example >>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/20100421-002-x86.exe >>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/yyymmdd-002-x86.exe Does anyone >>>> have any suggestions on how to code a batch >>>> file to download the patch based on specific date format? >>>> so I can set schedule task to run it. Does anyone have >>>> any suggestions? Thanks in advance for any suggestions >>>> Eric >>> >>> Even if you ARE successful, you're asking for trouble. >>> Yesterday McAfee finally caught up to Symantec in the race >>> to slow down computers. >> Slow, or KILL? > > No slowdown at all here, reasonably small footprint, excellent speed. > Actually I noticed NO difference when NIS 2009 and now 2010 were installed. > I think you guys are behind the times. McAfee I don't know about; haven't > used them in years. > > Twayne: You are correct, NIS 2010 is so much better than the last several products I've used. In fact, NIS 2010 is the only AV software that I have ever used that works so well that I will buy it again when my year ends. There are a few places where it can be purchased for a very low price. The very worst AV I ever used was Bit Defender 2009. 2008 was fairly good but 2009 required almost weekly removal and re-install, just to get it to work. Their 2010 version (thankfully I didn't try) has recently crashed a huge number of computers. It deleted thousands of files from any computers running Windows 7/64. Those posting here that bad mouth NIS 2009 or 2010 are showing their age, NIS once was bloated but not now. Sardine
From: Unknown on 22 Apr 2010 14:45 Don't you think you are showing YOUR age by using NIS instead of WSE? "Sardine" <sardineate(a)myway.com> wrote in message news:hqq4f8$7do$1(a)news.xmission.com... > Twayne wrote: >> In news:eP0pHsh4KHA.6132(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, >> Bob I <birelan(a)yahoo.com> typed: >>> HeyBub wrote: >>> >>>> Eric wrote: >>>> >>>>> I need to consistently download patch on following web >>>>> site, but the file name keeps changing based on date, for >>>>> example >>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/20100421-002-x86.exe >>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/yyymmdd-002-x86.exe Does anyone >>>>> have any suggestions on how to code a batch >>>>> file to download the patch based on specific date format? >>>>> so I can set schedule task to run it. Does anyone have >>>>> any suggestions? Thanks in advance for any suggestions >>>>> Eric >>>> >>>> Even if you ARE successful, you're asking for trouble. >>>> Yesterday McAfee finally caught up to Symantec in the race >>>> to slow down computers. >>> Slow, or KILL? >> >> No slowdown at all here, reasonably small footprint, excellent speed. >> Actually I noticed NO difference when NIS 2009 and now 2010 were >> installed. I think you guys are behind the times. McAfee I don't know >> about; haven't used them in years. >> >> > > Twayne: > > You are correct, NIS 2010 is so much better than the last several products > I've used. In fact, NIS 2010 is the only AV software that I have ever used > that works so well that I will buy it again when my year ends. There are a > few places where it can be purchased for a very low price. > > The very worst AV I ever used was Bit Defender 2009. 2008 was fairly good > but 2009 required almost weekly removal and re-install, just to get it to > work. Their 2010 version (thankfully I didn't try) has recently crashed a > huge number of computers. It deleted thousands of files from any computers > running Windows 7/64. > > Those posting here that bad mouth NIS 2009 or 2010 are showing their age, > NIS once was bloated but not now. > > Sardine
From: Sardine on 22 Apr 2010 14:43 WaIIy wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:27:53 -0600, Sardine <sardineate(a)myway.com> > wrote: > >> Twayne wrote: >>> In news:eP0pHsh4KHA.6132(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, >>> Bob I <birelan(a)yahoo.com> typed: >>>> HeyBub wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eric wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I need to consistently download patch on following web >>>>>> site, but the file name keeps changing based on date, for >>>>>> example >>>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/20100421-002-x86.exe >>>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/yyymmdd-002-x86.exe Does anyone >>>>>> have any suggestions on how to code a batch >>>>>> file to download the patch based on specific date format? >>>>>> so I can set schedule task to run it. Does anyone have >>>>>> any suggestions? Thanks in advance for any suggestions >>>>>> Eric >>>>> Even if you ARE successful, you're asking for trouble. >>>>> Yesterday McAfee finally caught up to Symantec in the race >>>>> to slow down computers. >>>> Slow, or KILL? >>> No slowdown at all here, reasonably small footprint, excellent speed. >>> Actually I noticed NO difference when NIS 2009 and now 2010 were installed. >>> I think you guys are behind the times. McAfee I don't know about; haven't >>> used them in years. >>> >>> >> Twayne: >> >> You are correct, NIS 2010 is so much better than the last several >> products I've used. In fact, NIS 2010 is the only AV software that I >> have ever used that works so well that I will buy it again when my year >> ends. There are a few places where it can be purchased for a very low price. >> >> The very worst AV I ever used was Bit Defender 2009. 2008 was fairly >> good but 2009 required almost weekly removal and re-install, just to get >> it to work. Their 2010 version (thankfully I didn't try) has recently >> crashed a huge number of computers. It deleted thousands of files from >> any computers running Windows 7/64. >> >> Those posting here that bad mouth NIS 2009 or 2010 are showing their >> age, NIS once was bloated but not now. >> >> Sardine > > NIS is one bloated POS, many, many agree. Wally: What do you suggest as some of the best AV to use? What criteria do you use to decide? Thanks, Sardine
From: Twayne on 23 Apr 2010 14:34 In news:lu51t55a84j6q0brhovs8vr2r3216er3en(a)4ax.com, WaIIy <WaIIy@(nft).invalid> typed: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:27:53 -0600, Sardine > <sardineate(a)myway.com> wrote: > >> Twayne wrote: >>> In news:eP0pHsh4KHA.6132(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, >>> Bob I <birelan(a)yahoo.com> typed: >>>> HeyBub wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eric wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I need to consistently download patch on following web >>>>>> site, but the file name keeps changing based on date, >>>>>> for >>>>>> example >>>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/20100421-002-x86.exe >>>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/yyymmdd-002-x86.exe >>>>>> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to code a batch >>>>>> file to download the patch based on specific date >>>>>> format? >>>>>> so I can set schedule task to run it. Does anyone have >>>>>> any suggestions? Thanks in advance for any suggestions >>>>>> Eric >>>>> >>>>> Even if you ARE successful, you're asking for trouble. >>>>> Yesterday McAfee finally caught up to Symantec in the >>>>> race to slow down computers. >>>> Slow, or KILL? >>> >>> No slowdown at all here, reasonably small footprint, >>> excellent speed. Actually I noticed NO difference when >>> NIS 2009 and now 2010 were installed. I think you guys >>> are behind the times. McAfee I don't know about; haven't >>> used them in years. >>> >>> >> >> Twayne: >> >> You are correct, NIS 2010 is so much better than the last >> several >> products I've used. In fact, NIS 2010 is the only AV >> software that I >> have ever used that works so well that I will buy it again >> when my year ends. There are a few places where it can be >> purchased for a very low price. >> >> The very worst AV I ever used was Bit Defender 2009. 2008 >> was fairly >> good but 2009 required almost weekly removal and >> re-install, just to get >> it to work. Their 2010 version (thankfully I didn't try) >> has recently crashed a huge number of computers. It >> deleted thousands of files from >> any computers running Windows 7/64. >> >> Those posting here that bad mouth NIS 2009 or 2010 are >> showing their >> age, NIS once was bloated but not now. >> >> Sardine > > NIS is one bloated POS, many, many agree. Many, many are ignorant of the last two year-titles of the product. That often happens to closed minds. Come back when you know what you're talking about.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: How to set schedule task? Next: Desktop Icon Names Want to Change Color |